Re: [Fink-devel] kdesdk3 stills does not compile

2005-03-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Neil Tiffin wrote: [] /sw/include/subversion-1/svn_sorts.h:26:23: apr_pools.h: No such file or directory With the latest version of svn and kdesdk3 on CVS this should be fixed. -- Martin --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read h

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread David H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Macks wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:48:04PM -0800, Trevor Harmon wrote: > >>On Mar 27, 2005, at 6:22 AM, David H. wrote: >> >>>Yes, ignoring this bullshit licensing issue all together. Four >>>highly paid, very well known and rather well

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread Benjamin Reed
David H. wrote: no, I am not. That are exactly the words that they told me. The likelyhood that we will end up in court because we "violate" the GPL is about 0. Not to mention that we are not the "active party" in this case. The long version on this topic is about 2 hours and a dinner worth. As the

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread David H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benjamin Reed wrote: > David H. wrote: > >> no, I am not. That are exactly the words that they told me. The >> likelyhood >> that we will end up in court because we "violate" the GPL is about 0. >> Not to >> mention that we are not the "active party"

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Re: gnome-python2-py23

2005-03-28 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 28 Mar 2005, at 04:36, Jeremy Higgs wrote: The next package is gnome-python (2.4.2), which, because it depends on GNOME, has a mass of dependencies. I've been trying to make some sense out of them, but haven't figured out what dependencies should be included, and what versions. Are there a

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread David R. Morrison
On Mar 28, 2005, at 10:08 AM, David H. wrote: And yes, I also think that we should not adopt a policy or attitude where we try to go out of our way just because there "might" be legal implications. In this spirit, can we have our old slogan back? "Unix software for your Mac"? (taken down beca

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread David R. Morrison
On Mar 28, 2005, at 10:08 AM, David H. wrote: Benjamin Reed wrote: And where is Fink incorporated again? That does not matter when it comes to copy right. Not at all. Actually, what matters for copyright is the country in which the item was published. If there are conflicting copyright laws, then

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread David H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2005, at 10:08 AM, David H. wrote: > >> And yes, I also think that we should not adopt a policy or attitude >> where we >> try to go out of our way just because there "might" be legal >> implications. >> > > I

[Fink-devel] bittorrent-4.0.0-3

2005-03-28 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
[maintainer cc'd] In the current version of bittorrent (4.0.0-3), installing bittorrent(non-x11) also builds the gui version (and needed dependencies like wxgtk and wxpython). This seems to be due to the use of splitoffs (base and -gui). In the previous version (3.4.2), the types of bittorren

Re: [Fink-devel] bittorrent-4.0.0-3

2005-03-28 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
I originally had variants in the info file, and cirdan changed it for the alternatives framework and splitoffs. (At least that's the way I remember it.) I don't like alternatives much but I thought, hey, if he cared that much for them I'd leave them in. Now that cirdan doesn't have the time to help

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Re: gnome-python2-py23

2005-03-28 Thread Jeremy Higgs
Thanks a lot for that! On 29 Mar 2005, at 2:01, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 28 Mar 2005, at 04:36, Jeremy Higgs wrote: The next package is gnome-python (2.4.2), which, because it depends on GNOME, has a mass of dependencies. I've been trying to make some sense out of them, but haven't figured

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems compiling imlib

2005-03-28 Thread Brent Edwards
Dear Koen, Thank you for the letter! Indeed, I have installed the X11 SDK; I am currently using XEmacs on my system, compiled with fink. -- Brent On Mar 27, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Mar 26, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Brent Edwards wrote: gdk_imlib_pri

Re: [Fink-devel] the gpl and openssl

2005-03-28 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
David R. Morrison wrote: Anthony, Thanks very much for this very helpful message. I'm curious of there is any difference for software released under the LGPL instead of the GPL. Can it legally link to openSSL? LGPL Sec. 6 seems to allow this: 6. As an exception to the Sections above, you may als

Re: [Fink-devel] License for .info and .patch files

2005-03-28 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
David R. Morrison wrote: But what about the .info files? Should we declare them to be part of fink, and therefore under the GPL? Can we do this retroactively, even though we didn't make it clear to contributers in the past? Most of a finkinfo file is just a statement of facts, and is nearly enti

Re: [Fink-devel] License for .info and .patch files

2005-03-28 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Mar 28, 2005, at 2:23 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: Most of a finkinfo file is just a statement of facts, and is nearly entirely determined by technical requirements. Those parts are most likely not copyrightable at all. No worries there, then. What about an almanac? A news broadcast? An encyc

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems compiling imlib

2005-03-28 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Mar 27, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Brent Edwards wrote: Dear Koen, Thank you for the letter! Indeed, I have installed the X11 SDK; I am currently using XEmacs on my system, compiled with fink. -- Brent So is imlib now working? If not, try searching Google, it will show

[Fink-devel] Re: License for .info and .patch files

2005-03-28 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Doesn't the .info contain the copyright statement (in at least some cases)? Isn't there some implication here? To my mind, when reading the document, the copyright applies to its bearing instrument unless expressly stated otherwise. Considering that the copyright (at least in spirit) applies to