On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:47 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
Now, cross compiling fink binaries would be cool too, so ppc can
build the x86 packages too :-) but I guess that would be at least
as hard.
I hope not! Building FAT sounds harder, because of the configure
issues and inability to do platf
Not yet sure how we'd want to set up such a system. Maybe have
release managers to take charge of back-porting and forward-
porting? Or maybe just a web interface where we can find other
maintainers' packages that have been verified to build on our $dist-
$arch so we can help them test? If we
On Jun 7, 2005, at 06:16, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
I think we're going to really need a system for testing--not just
build testing, actually testing if packages actually work too.
Right now we already have some
If packages had a mechanism such as "make check" which ran the
program through s
On Jun 7, 2005, at 10:24, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Since XCode 2.1 has only recently been released there may be
unforeseen issues between it and Fink. If you're willing to take
the risk of installing 2.1 and reporting any issues that you find
in building Fink packages, that would be ver
Fink was recently patched so that any "fink reinstall" of a package
whose binary does not exist is automatically upgraded to a "fink
rebuild" (a mode that always concludes by reinstalling). Without this,
users have observed that fink will crash, since it can't install a
non-existant .deb. I figure
Le 7 juin 2005 à 22:57, Daniel E. Macks a écrit :
Fink was recently patched so that any "fink reinstall" of a package
whose binary does not exist is automatically upgraded to a "fink
rebuild" (a mode that always concludes by reinstalling). Without this,
users have observed that fink will crash,
On Jun 7, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Adriaan wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to Fink and ran into some problems trying to install GNUcash.
After the last update I got this message:
Failed: Can't resolve dependency "bonobo-shlibs" for package
"gnucash-1.8.11-1" (no matching packages/versions found)
In th
