Hi Dan,
the public gdl-gnome shared library is present up to 2.23.90
inclusive. I have a libgdl1.0 package in my CVS experimental tree for
this version.
(http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/fink/experimental/mommsen/10.4/main/libgdl1.0.info?revision=1.1
)
I need the newer ver
Hi Dan,
there's now also a revision 1.2 in my experimental tree which merges
your changes with mine.
Remi
On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> the public gdl-gnome shared library is present up to 2.23.90
> inclusive. I have a libgdl1.0 package in my CVS experimental
Do you need gdl-gnome, or just "gdl >= 2.23.90"? The second part of
this commit gives you a new "libgdl-1.0" (and -shlibs) package that is
version 2.24.0.
dan
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:12:16AM +0100, Remi Mommsen wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> the public gdl-gnome shared library is present up to 2.23.90
Gnu day,
To resume, VLC 0.8.6i latest issue is ffmpeg :
https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=1924399&group_id=17203&atid=414256
ffmpeg compiled with the swscale mode disables some stuffs like
img_resample defined now as a deprecated API . I googled patches with
various sites like f
I'll start on a new ffmpeg then, I'll make a new snap.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 5-Nov-08, at 4:47 PM, Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
>
> Gnu day,
>
> To resume, VLC 0.8.6i latest issue is ffmpeg :
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker
On 06 Nov 2008, at 00:47, Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
> An other question: I worked with JF Mertens (thanks for the seamonkey
> fix ;) to update wxgtk to the 2.8.7 version a few months ago. I've
> just
> read on the site that 2.8.9 was considered as "Stable". Is this a
> primary required update
Here's what I managed to find out about APNG:
http://littlesvr.ca/apng/
It looks like a patch that is no longer being maintained by its author
and has not been integrated into the main line of libpng code. How
should we proceed?
-- Dave
On Nov 4, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Jean-François Mertens
File bug against seamonkey upstream? Seems poor for them to require
unreleased code in an external dependency (and at best they should be
forced to know they're doing so). Or does seamonkey have an on-board
libpng source and upstream will just say "use the one we ship"?
dan
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 a
David R. Morrison wrote:
> Here's what I managed to find out about APNG:
>
> http://littlesvr.ca/apng/
>
> It looks like a patch that is no longer being maintained by its author
> and has not been integrated into the main line of libpng code. How
> should we proceed?
That is correct. The l
On 06 Nov 2008, at 02:45, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Here's what I managed to find out about APNG:
>
> http://littlesvr.ca/apng/
>
> It looks like a patch that is no longer being maintained by its author
> and has not been integrated into the main line of libpng code. How
> should we proceed?
N
On 06 Nov 2008, at 04:11, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> Does upstream have anything to say about why they
> don't want to incorporate it ?
OK _ (at least part of) the discussion seemsto be here :
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?
msg_name=3.0.6.32.20070420132821.012dd8e8%40mail.
11 matches
Mail list logo
