Re: [Fink-devel] Drafts for a couple of policy addenda

2011-04-26 Thread Max Horn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sounds good to me! Bye, Max Am 21.04.2011 um 18:16 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Here's draft 2. > > > 3.7 Source Policy > > Sources should normally be downloaded from the location(s) that the >

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-26 Thread Max Horn
Am 18.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Daniel Macks: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:50:40 0200, Max Horn wrote: >> Am 18.04.2011 um 14:49 schrieb Max Horn: >>> >>> OK... anybody opposed? To summarize, this are the changes I > propose, each should be trivial to implement: >>> >>> 1) Drop the _warning_ when

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-26 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, On Apr 26, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 18.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Daniel Macks: > >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:50:40 0200, Max Horn wrote: >>> Am 18.04.2011 um 14:49 schrieb Max Horn: OK... anybody opposed? To summarize, this are the changes I >> propose, each shou

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:17:40 +0200, Max Horn wrote: > Am 18.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Daniel Macks: > There are some cases were the validator incorrectly complains about > perfectly fine packages. Currently, in such cases, the package > maintainer then is forced to either make weird unnatural hac

[Fink-devel] Fwd: updating bibtex2html to version 1.96

2011-04-26 Thread Jesse Alama
The maintainer of bibtex2html is happy to transfer his maintainership to me. I can submit an updated package description file soon making this change. -- Forwarded message -- From: philo...@free.fr Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:37 AM Subject: Re: updating bibtex2html to version 1.

Re: [Fink-devel] latest Buildworld results (2010-08-14)

2011-04-26 Thread Corey Halpin
On 2011-04-21, Max Horn wrote: Hello folks! (CC: fink-devel) I have emailed you and some other maintainers about half a year ago, reporting severe issues in your packages. Sadly, from a couple people (i.e. you), I did not hear back nor did I see a fix in our package repository. If you *did* f

[Fink-devel] glew needs update to 1.5.8

2011-04-26 Thread Jack Howarth
The new OpenGL shader support I enabled in the current pymol-py packaging doesn't work properly under the older glew package currently in unstable... There was an error intializing GLEW. Basic graphics, including shaders and volumes may be unavailable. GLEW-Error: GLX 1.2 and up are not sup

Re: [Fink-devel] latest Buildworld results (2010-08-14)

2011-04-26 Thread David Reiser
On Apr 26, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Corey Halpin wrote: > On 2011-04-21, Max Horn wrote: >> Hello folks! (CC: fink-devel) >> >> I have emailed you and some other maintainers about half a year ago, >> reporting severe issues in your packages. Sadly, from a couple people (i.e. >> you), I did not hear

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:52:54 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:17:40 +0200, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 18.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Daniel Macks: > > There are some cases were the validator incorrectly complains about > > perfectly fine packages. Currently, in such cases, the packag