No more // on sourceforge mirrors (Was Re: [Fink-devel] cdrdao won't download on Fink 0.7)

2004-04-05 Thread Martin Costabel
Michael Vilain wrote: There's a bug in the file /sw/fink/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/utils/cdrdao.info so that the Fink mirror that's used has a // in it. This is not the only package that has this. It has also had this since it was introduced in October 2002, without problems until now. But

[Fink-devel] Re: web/xml/faq faq.en.xml,1.9,1.10

2004-04-05 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Actually, this wasn't a misspelling: In this case They is an appropriate gender-neutral pronoun. On Apr 3, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/web/xml/faq In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv32722 Modified Files: faq.en.xml Log Message:

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: web/xml/faq faq.en.xml,1.9,1.10

2004-04-05 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 5 avr. 2004, à 14:30, Alexander K. Hansen a écrit : Actually, this wasn't a misspelling: In this case They is an appropriate gender-neutral pronoun. Oh, sorry, good to know (English grammar studies are way behind me). I thought that the same norms as in gettext were employed here. Michèle

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: web/xml/faq faq.en.xml,1.9,1.10

2004-04-05 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Just trying not to discriminate based on gender! On Apr 5, 2004, at 10:36 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 5 avr. 2004, à 14:30, Alexander K. Hansen a écrit : Actually, this wasn't a misspelling: In this case They is an appropriate gender-neutral pronoun. Oh, sorry, good to know (English grammar

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: web/xml/faq faq.en.xml,1.9,1.10

2004-04-05 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 5 avr. 2004, à 16:46, Alexander K. Hansen a écrit : Just trying not to discriminate based on gender! That's very kind :-). I can't tell you what I have to do if I go that way in French: pronouns, articles, adjectives, past participles and even sometimes nouns (if they exist at all) change.

[Fink-devel] (no subject)

2004-04-05 Thread Jules
Hey, I was wondering if I could ask you a few questions. We have successfully compiled the source codes for Opencascade ( http://www.opencascade.org/occ/> ) during our porting process to OS X. We compiled on OS X 10.3 using gcc3.3 and linked to the X11 SDK. Although, we got the whole thing to

[Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Jules
Hey, I was wondering if I could ask you a few questions. We have successfully compiled the source codes for Opencascade ( http://www.opencascade.org/occ/> ) during our porting process to OS X. We compiled on OS X 10.3 using gcc3.3 and linked to the X11 SDK. Although, we got the whole thing to

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
There are Fink packages that make you use 2.95, as it's available as an optional install from the XCode Developer Tools. Why not just do 2.95? On Apr 5, 2004, at 3:22 PM, Jules wrote: Hey, I was wondering if I could ask you a few questions. We have successfully compiled the source codes for

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Jules Ngambo
Thanks for your reply Alexander We 've gone very far in this and we have tried to change the compiler from the command line from gcc3.3 to gcc2.95. But it seem to give us a lot more rebuild work than we expected. We are looking to see whether we can find a way to fix these undefined

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Benjamin Reed
Jules wrote: dyld: /usr/local/bin/TTOPOLOGY Undefined symbols: __ZSt3cin __ZSt4cout __ZSt4endlIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_ __ZSt4endsIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_ __ZTTSt14basic_ifstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEE __ZTTSt14basic_ofstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEE

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread David R. Morrison
Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jules wrote: dyld: /usr/local/bin/TTOPOLOGY Undefined symbols: __ZSt3cin __ZSt4cout __ZSt4endlIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_ __ZSt4endsIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Benjamin Reed
David R. Morrison wrote: I thought it meant that they were linking a C++ library which was compiled with a different version of g++ than the one being currently used. Could be either, really. Just the gcc/g++ thing is the most common. The mix-and-match thing is true on all gcc platforms; I

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Mark Treiber
Thanks guys, i was having a similar problem with a package I was porting but this thread solved it. For me it turned out that the compile script was using g++ but linked with cc which I guess works on linux but was crapping out for me. Thanks again, Mark. On Apr 5, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Benjamin

Re: [Fink-devel] linking problem

2004-04-05 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Apr 5, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Jules wrote: dyld: /usr/local/bin/TTOPOLOGY Undefined symbols: __ZSt3cin __ZSt4cout __ZSt4endlIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_ [snip] It looks like you're trying to link a C++ program with gcc instead of with g++. Could that be it? Dave PGP.sig

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with undefined symbols...

2004-04-05 Thread Jules Ngambo
Thank you guys for your suggestion... Given that the compilation takes about 8 to 10 hours on a G5 computer, instead of recompiling I checked the log file of make and it seems that it is consistent, gcc is used for c files and g++ for cxx below is an piece of the log file when making it: g++