[Fink-devel] qt4-x11 vs Leopard

2007-06-25 Thread Jack Howarth
Has anyone tried to build the qt4-x11 package under Leopard yet? I am finding that the build appears to succeed but the packaging fails. The problem seems to be in the fact that nothing is being installed for the plugins/codecs in that package. So far I haven't been able to deduce why the build

Re: [Fink-devel] qt4-x11 vs Leopard

2007-06-25 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jack Howarth wrote: Has anyone tried to build the qt4-x11 package under Leopard yet? I am finding that the build appears to succeed but the packaging fails. The problem seems to be in the fact that nothing is being installed for the

[Fink-devel] Fwd: evince-0.5.2-1009

2007-06-25 Thread Sébastien Maret
Hello, I don't know how to fix this. Could somebody help? Thanks, Sébastien -- Forwarded message -- From: salvomic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jun 24, 2007 2:22 PM Subject: evince-0.5.2-1009 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Package manager version: 0.27.3 Distribution version:

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: evince-0.5.2-1009

2007-06-25 Thread Alexander Hansen
We've been seeing this style of error a lot after an intltool update. dmacks has generally just updated the package to a newer upstream version. Is one available? On 6/25/07, Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I don't know how to fix this. Could somebody help? Thanks,

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: evince-0.5.2-1009

2007-06-25 Thread Daniel Macks
Starting in the next-newer upstream version, need the pangocairo gtk+2 world. I'm working on just patching this old-version evince... dan On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 01:38:53PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: We've been seeing this style of error a lot after an intltool update. dmacks has generally

[Fink-devel] fink-prebinding dependency?

2007-06-25 Thread Jack Howarth
It has been suggested by the paraview developers that the extremely long launch times we see with paraview in fink 10.4 unstable may be due to the absence of prebinding of its shared libraries. If that is the case, shouldn't we be adding a dependency for fink-prebinding on those packages which

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-prebinding dependency?

2007-06-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 19:37 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: It has been suggested by the paraview developers that the extremely long launch times we see with paraview in fink 10.4 unstable may be due to the absence of prebinding of its shared libraries. If that is the case, shouldn't we be

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-prebinding dependency?

2007-06-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 19:37 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: It has been suggested by the paraview developers that the extremely long launch times we see with paraview in fink 10.4 unstable may be due to the absence of prebinding of its shared libraries. If that is the