-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Due to a combination of personal and professional trips, I'm going to
be quite busy until mid-January (probably with spotty 'net access, too).
To make matters even more difficult, neither of my 10.4 partitions
will currently boot. I've got 10.3 and a
Running on: 10.4.11
Package manager version: 0.27.9
Distribution version: 0.8.1.cvs powerpc
Additional bindists enabled: (but svn_1.4.6-11_darwin-powerpc.deb was
built locally)
deb http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/apt/10.4 unstable main crypto
deb http://xanana.ucsc.edu/fink_10.4 unstable
Alexander Hansen wrote:
So I'd appreciate it if folks would feel free to pop packages from the
tracker into the wild, and update mine as needed (including getting
the octave update out of the tracker)
I've a couple of hours left before leaving too, so will take care of the
latter, if no bad
Charles Lepple wrote:
[]
The -v option sheds a little more light on the subject, but I don't
know where python24-nox would have disappeared to:
I don't think any pythonXX-nox package exists any more. But this should
only give warnings, not errors.
$ nice fink -v update-all
Password:
On Dec 24, 2007 11:13 AM, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Lepple wrote:
[]
The -v option sheds a little more light on the subject, but I don't
know where python24-nox would have disappeared to:
I don't think any pythonXX-nox package exists any more. But this should
only
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
Sounds like good news!
http://developer.imendio.com/node/184
Yes. Native GTK has long been doable actually, and patches to bugs in
that arena (the Quartz back-end of gtk and related libs) are quite
well received upstream,
On 12/24/07, Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
Sounds like good news!
http://developer.imendio.com/node/184
Yes. Native GTK has long been doable actually, and patches to bugs in
that arena (the Quartz back-end of gtk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 12/24/07, Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin
wrote:
Sounds like good news!
http://developer.imendio.com/node/184
Yes. Native GTK has long been doable
On 12/24/07, Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
independent set of libraries: yes but gtk-apps should be easily
linked against both, shouldn't they? :)
If you mean both in the sense of separate Aqua and X11 packages,
then possibly--the details depend on what the package wants.
I
Charles Lepple wrote:
[]
I think the circular dependency comes from the fact that svn-swig-py24
depends not directly on svn-swig-py24-shlibs, but indirectly via the
virtual package svn-swig-py-shlibs that is provided by
svn-swig-py24-shlibs.
This could probably be fixed with the variant
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 12/24/07, Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
independent set of libraries: yes but gtk-apps should be easily
linked against both, shouldn't they? :)
If you mean both in the sense of separate Aqua and X11 packages,
then possibly--the details depend on what
well i'm not sure what version of GTK+OSX, I just built 0.7 for intel
10.5 which took me about an hour and lots of little code changes, then
I built gq, and it displays but nothing works, so unless there is a
newer version I think it's useless.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the
Hi, I'm trying to speed up fink installs on my new Leopard machine.
Our group has a couple of fast linux boxes which I'd like to ideally
set up as binary repositories. The problem obviously is that they run
(i686) Linux, not Darwin. It seems to me that I should be able to
compile fink and
In working on tcltk85 packaging for the new tcltk 8.5.0 release,
I noticed that the current tcltk packaging doesn't create a true buildroot
for itself. Specifically there isn't a BuildConflicts on tcltk-dev in
the tcltk info file. This means that the currently installed tcltk headers
are being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hugo Mallinson wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to speed up fink installs on my new Leopard machine.
Our group has a couple of fast linux boxes which I'd like to
ideally set up as binary repositories. The problem obviously is
that they run (i686) Linux, not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Hansen wrote:
One of the core developers has played around with cross-compiling and
distcc for Fink:
and I've ported his rh/fedora packages to slackware:
http://sid77.sidbox.homelinux.org/darwin-cross.html
HTH,
ciao
- --
Marco Bonetti
On 12/24/07, TheSin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well i'm not sure what version of GTK+OSX, I just built 0.7 for intel
10.5 which took me about an hour and lots of little code changes, then
I built gq, and it displays but nothing works, so unless there is a
newer version I think it's useless.
17 matches
Mail list logo
