On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Darian Lanx wrote:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
Yes, I vote for a solution in Perl as well, yet I still think that the
syntax is simply bad. Bad as in too complicated for the common or novice
packager to understand. Maybe we could
Daniel Macks wrote:
It we want to go programming-language-style:
Depends: %type_perl_version == 5.8.1 thing-pm
Depends: %type_nox == -nox || x11
It we want to be a bit more linguistic/thought-process oriented:
Depends: %type_perl_version = 5.8.1 ? thing-pm
Actually, I think the part that
Daniel Macks wrote:
snip all
Thoughts?
To put it short and please do not see this as completely useless
critique. This is too complicated for my taste. Creating packages for
Fink has to be as simple as humanly possible, because it enables us to
harvest more willing package maintainers when
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Darian Lanx wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
snip all
Thoughts?
To put it short and please do not see this as completely useless
critique. This is too complicated for my taste. [...] But you can
hardly expect the majority of the Mac community that
