Peter O'Gorman writes:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Tom Emerson wrote:
Greetings,
I see on http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/nomaintainer.php that the
Guile and Flex packages need a maintainer. I'm interested in doing
this, if no one else has taken them on.
I can't speak for Guile,
I grok the reason to keep around the different flex versions. But why
the older guile?
When a package supplies shared libraries, and the version of the shared
libraries changes in an update to the package, we keep the old package
around so that the old shared libraries are still available for
Greetings,
I see on http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/nomaintainer.php that the
Guile and Flex packages need a maintainer. I'm interested in doing
this, if no one else has taken them on.
Thanks.
-tree
--
Tom Emerson Basis Technology Corp.
Software
Tom Emerson wrote:
Greetings,
I see on http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/nomaintainer.php that the
Guile and Flex packages need a maintainer. I'm interested in doing
this, if no one else has taken them on.
I can't speak for Guile, but I had actually taken over flex at one point
and upgraded it to
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Tom Emerson wrote:
Greetings,
I see on http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/nomaintainer.php that the
Guile and Flex packages need a maintainer. I'm interested in doing
this, if no one else has taken them on.
I can't speak for Guile,
I can :)
While the package for guile-1.4
