On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 11:46 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Max, should we be trying to get CVS fink released and tested prior to a
binary distro? This sounds like an excellent feature...
We've already discussed it on the channel quite a bit this weekend, and
it doesn't really seem l
Max, should we be trying to get CVS fink released and tested prior to a
binary distro? This sounds like an excellent feature...
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
I noticed this as well, i dont have any more warnings in my log.
prebinding is *supposed* to give up and no longer give those warnings
(or even try) to redo prebinding once it has tried and failed the first
time. For some reason it kept trying before and it no longer does.
If you delete your pr
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 06:55 PM, Max Horn wrote:
As an maybe interesting sidenote, on my system that is cleanly
bootstrapped with the modified fink from CVS, I do not get any
prebinding-warning messages anymore... can anybody confirm/deny this?
Not sure about that, but...
Also I f
As an maybe interesting sidenote, on my system that is cleanly
bootstrapped with the modified fink from CVS, I do not get any
prebinding-warning messages anymore... can anybody confirm/deny this?
Also I found this in the ld man page, it looks very useful, too:
-prebind_allow_overlap
Have th
If anyone is interested, I've written a little utility that wraps gcc
and automatically creates a table of addresses to prebind with at link
time. You basically change the link portion of your build to, instead
of doing "gcc -dynamiclib foo bar", you do "gcc-prebind gcc -dynamiclib
foo bar", a
