Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-25 Thread Martin Costabel
On 25/10/10 04:08, Benjamin Reed wrote: [] If people's stuff using java would builddep on system-java-dev, then we'd know whether the user had it or not. ;) But the bdep could be satisfied with an older version of system-java-dev, without fink even knowing. This might pose a problem in a

Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-25 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/10 4:34 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: although there is no jni.h of version 1.6.0 anywhere. This looks doubly wrong now. I don't have the time to unravel the unholy spaghetti heap of symlinks in Apple's java stuff, but this seems to need

[Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-24 Thread David R. Morrison
(switching to fink-devel) On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Start by downloading the Java Developer Package from connect.apple.com, which now contains the headers. If that doesn't work, then cmake is going to need to be updated further to cope with the new state of

Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-24 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/10 8:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: (switching to fink-devel) On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Start by downloading the Java Developer Package from connect.apple.com, which now contains the headers. If that

Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/10 8:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: We're going to need to devise a test which can detect whether the user has done this, and gives some reasonable message if not. I'm not sure if this should just be a new virtual package that certain