Re: proposed new dlcompat (was :Re: [Fink-devel] Shared libs andinterpreters)

2002-02-19 Thread Max Horn
At 12:02 Uhr +0100 19.02.2002, Jorge Acereda MaciĆ” wrote: >On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 07:38 PM, Max Horn wrote: > >>In addition to what I wrote in my previous mail: why are >>"insertStatus", "lookupStatus" and "reference" not static? > >Errors :-) > >>The same for __dlCountList and __dlGet

Re: proposed new dlcompat (was :Re: [Fink-devel] Shared libs andinterpreters)

2002-02-14 Thread Max Horn
At 9:58 Uhr +0900 13.02.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >Jorge Acereda MaciĆ” has written a dlcompat with the ability to dlopen dylibs. > >I have put it on package submissions: >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=516734&group_id= >17203&atid=414256 > >Please check it out and comm

Re: proposed new dlcompat (was :Re: [Fink-devel] Shared libs andinterpreters)

2002-02-14 Thread Max Horn
In addition to what I wrote in my previous mail: why are "insertStatus", "lookupStatus" and "reference" not static? The same for __dlCountList and __dlGetQueue, only that I assume they are meant to provide some sort of undocmented API - and that is IMHO a very bad thing, unless there are very