Re: [Fink-devel] Checking MacOSX version number

From http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=943986&group_id=172 03&atid=414256 > I added darwin (>= 7.4.0) in the Build field. On 5/28/04 1:40 AM, "Sébastien Maret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on a package that compiles and runs only on MacOSX10.3.4, because > of

Re: [Fink-devel] Common problems?

Welcome to the helish world of porting evolution. I have been trying for a couple of weeks. I actually had to remove the occurrences of libeconduit from the makefile. I don't know if I should have done this, but it seemed to work. I lossed my patch or I would send it to you, but I think I will try

Re: [Fink-devel] Common problems?

It looks like the Makefile actually sets the sources to nothing, I guess this confuses Mac OS X. Is there some falg that needs to be added to skip the process when no sources are specified? > Welcome to the helish world of porting evolution. I have been trying for a > couple of weeks. I actually

[Fink-devel] db3 (& Evolution)

Title: db3  (& Evolution) Quick Question, I am down to 2 errors compiling evolution and I was looking around at how it will fit in with the current fink packages. Evolution requires Berkley's db 3.1.17. Splitting db  into db3 and db4 was a good idea, but db3 is version 3.3.11. What do packages t

Re: [Fink-devel] db3 (& Evolution)

dding db-3.1.17 as another > source, compiling it static, installing it in somewhere in the > build folder, and then linking evolution against the static lib. > > Did you put the mutexes back into 3.1.17? (just curious). > > Peter > On Monday, January 21, 2002, at 12:14 PM, Pa

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: db3 (& Evolution)

This was actually my first idea, but if someone needs db 3 and db 4 it seems like a lot to have three installations of db. > > On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 11:57 PM, Patrick Tescher wrote: > >> Quick Question, I am down to 2 errors compiling evolution and I was >> loo

Re: [Fink-devel] db3 (& Evolution)

lly want to ), > libs,includes, bin, and doc. You could depend on the libs and > BuildDepends on the includes. This would be a nightmare of > conflicts and depends for me. > > Option 3) > same as below. > > Thoughts? > > Peter > On Monday, January 21, 2002, at 02:30

Re: [Fink-devel] info file submission

You should submit it to the package submission tracker Someone will hopefully look at it and add it to the CVS. > Wow! I have to say that I'm impressed with fink. I've created an > info file for an app which I had previously been insta

Re: [Fink-devel] Evolution

I got pretty far, just had a few problems with undefined variables in the calendar section. If you or anyone wants to try, I can help them. > Has there been any progress on porting Evolution? I realize it is a bit > of a nightmare since it depends on a zillion rapidly changing libraries. > > I'

Re: [Fink-devel] Evolution

days. > Patrick Tescher wrote: >> I got pretty far, just had a few problems with undefined variables in >> the >> calendar section. If you or anyone wants to try, I can help them. > > Would you mind putting your work so far (a patch file would be great) > somewhere e

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander v. 0.1.1

Personally I think this looks great. Thanks a lot. Also, if you uploaded this to the CVS, it would be really easily to get the newest version since the dev tools have built in CVS tools. > Although it appears from the discussion that this is unlikely to go > anywhere in the near future, I wanted

Re: [Fink-devel] [ANN] My experiences with Apple

Sorry, I didn't read this before I posted my earlier message. Your absolutely right, unless of course there are problems with minors contributing to other open source projects... Hope not. > While I completly feel with Finlay, let's please not discuss this > matter here, there are other places be

Re: [Fink-devel] [ANN] My experiences with Apple

I just wanted to applaud Finlay on how he this. Some people would have ranted on about how apple should be more like other open source projects. I don't think he posted the article on sourceforge (although I could be wrong), and it looks like he actually corrected it. Anyway I am glad we have deve

Re: [Fink-devel] Darwin/MacOSX packages, why so many ways ?

On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 04:45 AM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: > Would it be possible to unite all those efforts ? I Don't think this is a realistic goal. Part of what makes the open source community so great is that there are different ways to do everything. I think a better goal would