My install went fine (syst-tex was where it was supposed to be) and
everything seems to be working. I have tested it out on a document that
uses T1 fonts and it renders them correctly, also correctly calls on
ghostscript to render included postscript figures.
You might want to configure it t
Dave,
the second revision failed to install with the following error message
(I put the new files in my local tree and did fink update tetex-beta).
...
Transcript written on mptopdf.log.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmt
version number, also fink cleanup and fink scanpackages
After the failed install of version 2, tex couldn't find my personal
style files any more, so that's why I am trying to downgrade.
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:21 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
William McCallum wrote:
Dave,
t
Thomas,
This particular problem is caused by fancyhdr.sty, which has changed
the way it does footrulewidth (see comments in that file).
I think you should replace
\setlength{\footrulewidth}{0.4pt}
with
\def\footrulewideth{0.4pt}
I'm not sure this is right, because I haven't been able to TeX
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:15:03 -0400, Aaron Davies wrote:
>I'm trying to write a package file, but I'm not sure how to test it. Is
>there somewhere I can put it so I can tell fink to try it out?
>--
If you mean you've made a .info file, put it in /sw/fink/dists/local/
main/finkinfo. The local tre
I'm posting this here in case it might be useful to the people working
on KDE.
The problem with KDE startup that I described earlier (same one Douglas
Wing was having) was caused by kdeinit being unhappy about multiple
definitions of the variable _name (see the log I posted to fink-users
earl
O.K. (duh!), putting the line
unset DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE
into my .xinitrc file before calling dkeinit (but after sourcing
/sw/bin/init.sh) enables me to have a normal KDE startup.
Should I post this to fink-users, or is there something dangerous and
evil about doing this?
Regards,
JF Mertens wrote:
> On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 08:38 , William McCallum wrote:
>
> > O.K. (duh!), putting the line
> >
> > unset DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE
> >
> > into my .xinitrc file before calling dkeinit (but after sourcing
> > /sw/bin/init.s
O.K., I see now that removing libxpg4 also solves the KDE startup
problem (I just tried it). I assume that it *is* safe to post this info
to fink-users?
Regards,
Bill McCallum
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Appli
I have a stupid question. Needing maxima in order to review a calculus
textbook based on it, I found out how to install it from a version in
cvs at sourceforge, so I thought I might as well make a fink package.
The problem is there doesn't seem to be a tarball for this version. What
do I do?
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 03:49 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Hi Bill. maxima is under GPL, right? Let's make a tarball of the
> source
> and put it on fink's site... the package can download from there.
>
> -- Dave
Dave and Ben,
thanks for the responses.
Since Ben is unsure about t
I have compiled both these packages on 10.2 without any problems. They
could be moved to 10.2/unstable
Regards,
Bill McCallum
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
> 2. Does anyone ever actually install different flavors of emacs at
> once? Is the debian policy overengineered, and the simple approach of
> putting everything in site-lisp is sufficient?
Yes, for example, you sometimes use car
It would be really useful is such a thing would incorporate the
definitions of the fields and the percent expansions, so you didn't
have to hunt them down in the documentation.
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 06:14 AM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Trivial you say... muhahahhaa :) :) !
This would
Dave,
Perhaps those of us (like me) who submit fairly straightforward
packages that more or less compile out of the box could help in dealing
with the submission of like packages. One of the big honchos would
still have to do the assignment of packages, but then we could do the
routine checkin
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies, "fink validate"
errors on .deb file or info file
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission
tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for
obvious things like shared library dependencies,
"fink validate" errors on .deb file or info fil
Speaking of maxima, once you get clisp to compile, I think you'll find
the version of maxima in the package submission tracker much nicer than
the one in unstable.
Bill
On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 01:42 AM, Christophe Trophime wrote:
I am using fink from CVS (0.5.0CVS)
I am trying to inst
18 matches
Mail list logo
