On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 04:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you know if the legal resolution was:
>
> - we can use dpkg for Darwin because it will never ship with OSX
> and is not required to build the foundation of OS X?
>
> - we can use dpkg for Darwin because our law
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Beautiful. I'm glad to see that that is finally moving forward...
>
> Do you know if the legal resolution was:
>
> - we can use dpkg for Darwin because it will never ship with OSX and
> is not required to build the foundation of OS X?
>
> - we can use d
Beautiful. I'm glad to see that that is finally moving forward...
Do you know if the legal resolution was:
- we can use dpkg for Darwin because it will never ship with OSX and
is not required to build the foundation of OS X?
- we can use dpkg for Darwin because our lawyer's re
FYI, the most recent release of the stand-alone Darwin package *does*
use the debian package manager.
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Unfortunately, the reason why Apple ships with the very old and very
limited versions of the various command line tools is mostly a legal
one. In particular, a lot of effort has been expended on *not* shipping
any GPL'd tools in the base system because of the extreme limitations of
