[Fink-devel] new QT packages

2002-05-11 Thread Benjamin Reed

There are new QT packages in unstable: qt2 and qt3.  If you've been 
having dependency problems I ask that you please give these a shot and 
see if this fixes things.

What we've ended up doing is getting rid of qt altogether.  qt2 and 
qt3 both conflict with each other, but their -shlibs counterparts can 
both be installed at the same time.

If you are a packager and have a package that depends on qt or depends 
on qt3 but actually only works with qt2, please update it.  I didn't 
see anything obvious in a grep, but there may be things I've missed.

Thanks!


___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new QT packages

2002-05-11 Thread Justin Hallett

the problem is that qt was made to live in seperate directories, Not that
I want to say it but I think we should see how debian handled this to
avoid more problems.  The problem with this I think will be with the bin
portion.  I think that the qt2-shlibs will need qt2-bin I'm sure the
qt2-bin and qt3-bin moc binary are not the same.  I think we might need to
put them in /sw/share/qt2 and /sw/share/qt3 I know this was done with the
first qt3 pkg and Max didn't like it but it was also installed in /sw/qt3.
 I think it's the only way they can both truly co-exist.  Unless this way
works for everyone but their will have to be restrictions like version
specific depends on -bin and on qt won't really be possible.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What we've ended up doing is getting rid of qt altogether.  qt2 and 
qt3 both conflict with each other, but their -shlibs counterparts can 
both be installed at the same time.

¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
  Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst   
  Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,


___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new QT packages

2002-05-11 Thread Benjamin Reed


On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 02:45 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:

 the problem is that qt was made to live in seperate directories, Not 
 that
 I want to say it but I think we should see how debian handled this to
 avoid more problems.  The problem with this I think will be with the bin
 portion.  I think that the qt2-shlibs will need qt2-bin I'm sure the
 qt2-bin and qt3-bin moc binary are not the same.  I think we might need 
 to
 put them in /sw/share/qt2 and /sw/share/qt3 I know this was done with 
 the
 first qt3 pkg and Max didn't like it but it was also installed in 
 /sw/qt3.
  I think it's the only way they can both truly co-exist.  Unless this 
 way
 works for everyone but their will have to be restrictions like version
 specific depends on -bin and on qt won't really be possible.

No... the only things that need to coexist are shlibs for runtime.

the -bin package is only for end-user binaries (qt designer and such).  
moc and other utilities that are used for actual building *with* qt are 
part of the base (qt2/qt3) package.  They should be able to upgrade over 
each other at any time.  Just like any other properly created shlibs 
(grin).  The problem we ran into was we tried to make a temporary 
solution for people upgrading over the qt-3.0.* packages and it bit us 
once we realized we needed qt2 and qt3 to coexist.

Part of the problem was we first had the conversation about it on IRC no 
one thought there were any apps in fink that had problems with qt3 and 
wanted to be built in qt2.  Now it turns out there is (or at least 
something being packaged), and we need both.  :(

Ahh, well, it's hopefully over now.  Things are the way they should have 
been in the beginning if we hadn't been confused about the -shlibs 
thing...  We'll just chalk it up to a learning experience.


___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel