Chris Devers [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
> > I assume this is a libtool bug in the openldap package?
>
> You can get openldap to compile? I've been trying without success to build
> openldap-2.0.19-1 for a couple of weeks now, and sent messages about
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> I assume this is a libtool bug in the openldap package?
You can get openldap to compile? I've been trying without success to build
openldap-2.0.19-1 for a couple of weeks now, and sent messages about it to
the Fink lists & Finlay Dobbie, but never got
David R. Morrison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Looks like a bug, alright.
>
> Check out the openldap-ssl submission on the package submission tracker, and
> see if that has fixed it. I'm just waiting for one final response from
> the submitter before committing the new one to CVS.
Correction...
David R. Morrison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Looks like a bug, alright.
>
> Check out the openldap-ssl submission on the package submission tracker, and
> see if that has fixed it. I'm just waiting for one final response from
> the submitter before committing the new one to CVS.
The new openl
David R. Morrison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Looks like a bug, alright.
>
> Check out the openldap-ssl submission on the package submission tracker, and
> see if that has fixed it. I'm just waiting for one final response from
> the submitter before committing the new one to CVS.
OK, I'm build
Looks like a bug, alright.
Check out the openldap-ssl submission on the package submission tracker, and
see if that has fixed it. I'm just waiting for one final response from
the submitter before committing the new one to CVS.
-- Dave
___
Fink-deve
