At 21:35 Uhr -0700 27.01.2002, Justin Hallett wrote:
>I't like to request that %n is being used in Souce and SouceDirectory
>fields. Like ti checks to %v
it used to that long ago, and I took it out on purpose. Using %n in
the Source field is OK, but not at all required. There are two
reasons f
I't like to request that %n is being used in Souce and SouceDirectory
fields. Like ti checks to %v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>No worries.
>
>I thought about this, too, and plan to add it. Another thing: it
>should verify the Maintainer field is valid:
> Full Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
¸.·´^`·.
At 13:10 Uhr -0500 27.01.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Hi Max. While fixing up my packages, I noticed one more thing which perhaps
>the validator should check: the license field should only be one of our
>allowed values. (I've had folks put all sorts of strange things there
>in packages submi
On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 06:10 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> I guess the only allowed thing
> which is not in the documentation is to add /LDP for linux documentation
> project.
I added that to the documentation a few weeks back.
-- Finlay
__
