[Fink-users] Re: MacOS X, Fink DocBook bundle

2002-02-28 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Sasha Zucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | docbook-dtd's (all sgml and xml releases) with working catalog files All of them? Anything prior to about DocBook 3.1 is really just for historical interest. Not that there's anything wrong with distributing them, of course...

Re: [Fink-users] Pymol

2002-02-28 Thread Matt Stephenson
Have just committed a package for pymol to cvs, No promises though :) Matt On Friday, March 1, 2002, at 02:37 AM, William McCallum wrote: > > On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 07:16 AM, Ausaf Bari wrote: > >> When is Pymol going to be available on Fink? Currently it is available >> through th

Re: [Fink-users] Re: compiling octave

2002-02-28 Thread Martin Costabel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thank you for your help Rincho...but it didn't solve my trouble..I still > get this compiling error: > > In file included from dMatrix.h:36, > from CollocWt.h:32, > from CollocWt.cc:33: > data-conv.h:41: #error "No 2 byte integer t

Re: [Fink-users] RE: Pan

2002-02-28 Thread Riccardo Gusso
Il 28-02-2002 20:29, David R. Morrison da [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Riccardo Gusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds like you have a rather old fink distribution! According to the > package database on the fink web site, version 0.11.1-1 was stable > in the fink 0.3.2a distribution. S

[Fink-users] Re: compiling octave

2002-02-28 Thread ferrachat
Thank you for your help Rincho...but it didn't solve my trouble..I still get this compiling error: In file included from dMatrix.h:36, from CollocWt.h:32, from CollocWt.cc:33: data-conv.h:41: #error "No 2 byte integer type found!" data-conv.h:49: #error "No 4

Re: [Fink-users] Re: compiling octave

2002-02-28 Thread rincho kuma
I had the same problem before and it went away after I did some selfupdate and update-all. I have 2.1.35-6 install on my powerbook, >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Fink-users] Re: compiling octave >Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 23:50:07 -0800 > >Hi everybody, > >Sorry to re-p

Re: [Fink-users] RE: Pan

2002-02-28 Thread David R. Morrison
Riccardo Gusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've a question about this: in the faq it is written that "If you only want > one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy those .info files (and > their associated .patch files, if there are any) from > /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo to > /

Re: [Fink-users] RE: Pan

2002-02-28 Thread Riccardo Gusso
Il 28-02-2002 15:07, David R. Morrison da [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > If you are interested in using the package, get it from unstable, try it > out, and report your success or failure to the maintainer. I've a question about this: in the faq it is written that "If you only want one or two sp

Re: [Fink-users] Pymol

2002-02-28 Thread William McCallum
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 07:16 AM, Ausaf Bari wrote: > When is Pymol going to be available on Fink? Currently it is available > through the one-step Gnu-Darwin installer. I don't know if I should go > ahead and use this installer. Wouldn't it conflict with the Fink > installation? > >

[Fink-users] Pymol

2002-02-28 Thread Ausaf Bari
When is Pymol going to be available on Fink? Currently it is available through the one-step Gnu-Darwin installer. I don't know if I should go ahead and use this installer. Wouldn't it conflict with the Fink installation? -Ausaf Bari -- MD-PhD Candidate Neuropharmacology Boston University Scho

[Fink-users] RE: Pan

2002-02-28 Thread David R. Morrison
> Yes. But I intended to say: "how much time does usually takes the debugging > process?" Just this. And thanks a lot to all fink maintainers. When a fink package is added to the unstable tree, the fink maintainer believes that the package is ready to go. But we wait for some positive feedback f

Re: [Fink-users] Pan

2002-02-28 Thread Riccardo Gusso
Il 28-02-2002 12:58, Bertrand Lupart da [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: >> From the pan web site I see that release 0.11.2 (stable) has been released. >> Since it has a lot of nice features that are missing in 0.11.1 and I see >> that fink package pan 0.11.2-1 is in current-unstable section I was a

Re: [Fink-users] Pan

2002-02-28 Thread Bertrand Lupart
> From the pan web site I see that release 0.11.2 (stable) has been released. > Since it has a lot of nice features that are missing in 0.11.1 and I see > that fink package pan 0.11.2-1 is in current-unstable section I was asking > myself when will it appear in cuurent-stable section. It might mo

[Fink-users] Pan

2002-02-28 Thread Riccardo Gusso
>From the pan web site I see that release 0.11.2 (stable) has been released. Since it has a lot of nice features that are missing in 0.11.1 and I see that fink package pan 0.11.2-1 is in current-unstable section I was asking myself when will it appear in cuurent-stable section. Btw, what does the

Re: [Fink-users] TIP: going from source to binary

2002-02-28 Thread Massimo Marino
Did not work for me. >This answers another Question I've been Frequently Asking myself. >When I use dselect, packages that were installed from source using >fink often show up in a section called Obsolete/Local. Running fink >scanpackage has persuaded dselect that they are neither obsolete nor