Title: Scigraphica
I tried to install scigraphica 0.8.0 from the source file. I installed via Fink the required gtk+ libraries and when I launch the ./configure script, everithing seems OK until I have the following message :
checking for tgoto in -ltermcap... no
configure: error: Termcap not
Did you modify your environment as per
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-general.php#compile-myself
?
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 08:00, Eric LEROY wrote:
I tried to install scigraphica 0.8.0 from the source file. I installed via
Fink the required gtk+ libraries and when I launch the
Did you put a request in the package request tracker?
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 12:51, Roger Wong wrote:
(was: cdrecord -- anyone try with a Powerbook or external USB/Firewire?)
But the man pages and the documentation are not enough
to make this an easily useable application for me. It may
Hi, Ben--
Hmm. I haven't installed Codewarrior -- But I did, as I said, install
Apple's Dev Tools, and I also installed tcpflow and perhaps a couple of
other small utilities. Perhaps it was one of them.
All My Best,
Jeffrey
on 12/16/02 7:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know what the status of the system-xtools package is? I
can't find it under release 0.5 and need it, since I have XTools
installed on my max and Not XFree86.
Matthiass
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great
hiyer,
i'm looking for a small/simple os x c compiler.
i know there's gcc that comes with apple dev tools and i also know there's
this one here:
http://www.opensource.apple.com//projects/darwin/1.2/projects.html on the
darwin page, but is there a simple, small one? that just compiles c maybe?
My understanding is that Xtools doesn't work on 10.2.
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 14:21, Matthias Troyer wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know what the status of the system-xtools package is? I
can't find it under release 0.5 and need it, since I have XTools
installed on my max and Not XFree86.
On Dec 16,2002 20:21:00 +0100, Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Hi,
Does anybody know what the status of the system-xtools package is? I
can't find it under release 0.5 and need it, since I have XTools
installed on my max and Not XFree86.
Matthiass
None of the Fink developers is
Any ideas what I should do
--
Last login: Mon Dec 16 09:57:58 on console
Welcome to Darwin!
[smith:~] esmith% startx -quartz
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
Elliott Smith wrote:
[smith:~] esmith% startx -quartz
Wrong syntax, use startx -- -quartz.
--
Martin
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 09:01 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Dec 16,2002 20:21:00 +0100, Matthias Troyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Hi,
Does anybody know what the status of the system-xtools package is? I
can't find it under release 0.5 and need it, since I have XTools
installed on
Sorry to bug, but after having great success with fink, I've decided to
use it to try to get XFree going.
Here's what I get:
[io:~] jon% startx -- -rootless
2002-12-16 17:41:32.190 XDarwin[1326]
XDarwin 1.1
Running rootless inside Mac OS X window server.
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 / X Window System
I'm pleased to see the new update of Fink for OS X 10.2 and appreciate
the effort that went into it. However, I really need to say that it is
a disservice to the project to have released it prematurely. Fink
provides tools critical to many people's professional work and a
certain degree of
I write in response to the user who complained about the premature release
of 0.5.0a, with a question for other Fink users to help guide the Fink team
in future decision-making.
Should we have pulled the distribution when we realized that there was
trouble with the upgrade matrix? Or is the note
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 04:39 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Should we have pulled the distribution when we realized that there was
trouble with the upgrade matrix?
No.
Or is the note about this on the webpage
enough?
Yes. Users can always just wait for us to fix the upgrade
At 05:40 PM -0800 12/16/02, Ben Hines wrote:
Eric: you are welcome to your money back.
That's hardly a helpful response. This just sends the message that
free means its not worth having and might even damage your system as
apparently happened in this case. The same thing happened to me but I
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 06:10 PM, Brad Cox wrote:
At 05:40 PM -0800 12/16/02, Ben Hines wrote:
Eric: you are welcome to your money back.
That's hardly a helpful response. This just sends the message that
free means its not worth having and might even damage your system as
The upgrade worked fine for me. I'm happy! Don't quit, please :-)
simon
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 09:16 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
His post was not particularly helpful either, IMO. We know the upgrade
situation is bad and don't really need people bitching at us about it,
really. There was
I'm not a member of the development team, but I think your complaint is
totally pointless. If you CRITICALLY rely on softwares developed and
distributed in forms like the fink environment, you just need to be
more cautious and careful in updating, don't you? For example, you
could, and still
On Monday, Dec 16, 2002, at 18:10 US/Pacific, Brad Cox wrote:
At 05:40 PM -0800 12/16/02, Ben Hines wrote:
Eric: you are welcome to your money back.
That's hardly a helpful response. This just sends the message that
free means its not worth having and might even damage your system as
Upgrade fever is hardly the problem here, since OS X 10.2 is a
significant improvment in quality over OS X 10.1 and this is the first
announced, stable release of fink for OS X 10.2.
;; --
As much as I like fink and hate to see if being bashed, I believe that
this attitude:
For whaterver
hello,
First-Time poster here.
I have used fink since the OS 10.0 times, and very grateful for the
10.2 update. My previous version of fink had gotten all tangled,(
crashing all the time, no white border around the black cursor etc...)
was very happy at the chance for clean install,
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:15 PM, David Getzin wrote:
one more question, has anyone been able to get arts working? I have
to admit at not trying very hard so far, but here are my results:
We recently got arts fully ported to OS X, and it is now available in
the fink unstable
On Monday, Dec 16, 2002, at 22:15 US/Pacific, David Getzin wrote:
snipped
I have windowmaker going by means of a cheater patch (the 6.x
package from forked) - the other applications are by no means
Mission critical to me, but they were very very useful. I checked
on the Web site, and my
24 matches
Mail list logo
