Hi there,
Well, I found this:
find /sw/src/fink.build | grep site
/sw/src/fink.build/apbs-1.1.0-2/apbs-1.1.0-source/contrib/opal/ZSI/@INSTALL_DIR45643{prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages
Apparently, at least IMHO, variable @INSTALL_DIR@ is not correctly being
replaced in apbs.info:
sed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan wrote:
Hi there,
Well, I found this:
find /sw/src/fink.build | grep site
/sw/src/fink.build/apbs-1.1.0-2/apbs-1.1.0-source/contrib/opal/ZSI/@INSTALL_DIR45643{prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages
Apparently, at least IMHO, variable
Dear Alexander,
When you did a fresh install, the first package you installed was fink
install apbs and the lots of dependences (including python 2.6) came
together, right?
Looking at the error and log I have the suspicion that if I install apbs and
then during the process python 2.6 is build I
Hi Alan:
It looks like there are multiple problems with this package and I
think I am going to throw the vile thing into the fire and start over.
I can't give you my debians because they were built for /sw64 instead
of /sw.
If you need apbs in a hurry for a pymol plugin, you can grab David
It turns out there is a typo on line 38 of the patch file
+sitepk...@install_dir$${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-packages
should be
+sitepk...@install_dir@${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-packages
This corrects the problem you found.
However there are some additional problems in
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-owner
--no-same-permissions
[ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.patch ]
patch -p1 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.patch
patching file
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-
owner
--no-same-permissions
[ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.patch ]
patch -p1
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:52:38PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-
owner
--no-same-permissions
[ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.patch ]
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:52:38PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-
owner
--no-same-permissions
[ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.patch ]
On 01/08/2009, at 18:08, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:52:38PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-
owner
--no-same-permissions
[ -r
On 01/08/2009, at 18:14, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:52:38PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-
owner
--no-same-permissions
[ -r
On 1/8/09 22:08, Jack Howarth wrote:
Are both of you running Xcode 3.1b3 on Leopard? I did my test build
on a dual G5 running 10.5.7 with Xcode 3.1.3 without issues. What does...
which autoheader
and
/usr/bin/autoheader -V
return on your machines? Xcode 3.1.3 has...
autoheader
William G. Scott wrote:
It turns out there is a typo on line 38 of the patch file
+sitepk...@install_dir$${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-packages
should be
+sitepk...@install_dir@${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-packages
This corrects the problem you found.
However
On Aug 1, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
William G. Scott wrote:
It turns out there is a typo on line 38 of the patch file
+sitepk...@install_dir$${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-
packages
should be
+sitepk...@install_dir@${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-
packages
Build of gcc42-4.2.4 failed right at the start with :
cd boehm-gc
autoheader -I .. -I ../config
configure.ac:52: error: m4_copy: won't overwrite defined macro:
_AC_ARG_VAR_PRECIOUS
configure.ac:52: the top level
autom4te-2.64: /sw/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
This is with fink's
On 01/08/2009, at 18:36, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 18:08, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:52:38PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc /sw/src/gcc-4.2.4.tar.bz2 | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-
owner
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 08:45:49PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 18:36, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 18:08, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:52:38PM -0300, monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 16:24, Mike Zanker wrote:
This is what I'm getting:
bzip2 -dc
monipol wrote:
On 01/08/2009, at 18:14, Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
Could you grab a copy of the older gcc42 packaging from...
http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.info?revision=1.10
and try replacing the copy in
Hopefully it will work now. (revision 4)
On Sat, August 1, 2009 3:48 pm, Martin Costabel wrote:
William G. Scott wrote:
It turns out there is a typo on line 38 of the patch file
+sitepk...@install_dir$${prefix}/lib/python${PY_VERSION}/site-packages
should be
Martin Costabel wrote:
I guess pogma needs to add another patch for autoconf-2.64.
Or Fink needs to go back to autoconf-2.63.
Well, gcc requires the use of specific, non-vendor patched versions of
the autotools, the version of autoconf currently required is 2.59. Using
any other version to
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 09:00:07PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
I guess pogma needs to add another patch for autoconf-2.64.
Or Fink needs to go back to autoconf-2.63.
Well, gcc requires the use of specific, non-vendor patched versions of
the autotools, the
21 matches
Mail list logo
