James Howse wrote:
> Just an FYI, the latest version of maxima at their sourceforge site is
> 5.17.1, perhaps it fixes this error.
>
Unfortunately, no; but it's apparently fixed in their current CVS
version. I've gone ahead and updated to 5.17.1 in current/unstable
regardless
--
Alexander Hanse
Just an FYI, the latest version of maxima at their sourceforge site is
5.17.1, perhaps it fixes this error.
On 22 Jan 2009, at 04:01, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote:
Hello all,
On 22 Jan 2009, at 04:01, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>> On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is:
>>>
>>> integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf);
>>>
>>> The output maxima gives me (after res
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote:
>
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is:
>>
>> integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf);
>>
>> The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is:
>>
>> Integral is divergent
>
On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is:
>
> integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf);
>
> The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is:
>
> Integral is divergent
> -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(t
Hello all,
There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is:
integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf);
The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is:
Integral is divergent
-- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true);
The correct output is:
1/(2*R^2)
This expression "in
