Alexander Hansen said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/10/10 5:37 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
>> Alexander Hansen said:
>
>
Question: when (or more importantly, why) did EMBOSS suddenly require the
installation of (all of) 263 dependencies, including what
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, EMBOSS is the _only_ package being updated.
Same result if I do a "fink update emboss":
fink update emboss
Password:
Information about 9508 packages read in 2 seconds.
fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/10/10 5:37 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
> Alexander Hansen said:
>>>
>>> Question: when (or more importantly, why) did EMBOSS suddenly require the
>>> installation of (all of) 263 dependencies, including what appears to be all
>>> of GNOME?
>>
Alexander Hansen said:
> On 8/10/10 2:30 PM, Scott R. Santos wrote:
>>
>> The following package will be installed or updated:
>> emboss
>> The following 263 additional packages will be installed:
>> app-defaults appleotffonts applesystemfonts aquaterm aquaterm-dev
>> aquaterm-shlibs atk1 atk1-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Removing now-former emboss maintainer.
On 8/10/10 2:30 PM, Scott R. Santos wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following a "sudo fink update-all", I was greeted with the following (which
> left me scratching my head):
>
Don't use "sudo fink".
> Informat
Hi everyone,
Following a "sudo fink update-all", I was greeted with the following (which
left me scratching my head):
Information about 9508 packages read in 3 seconds.
fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
candidates:
(1) octave: Matlab-like languag