Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: [] net-snmp* is pretty broken on all machines right now. Someone could do a quick-change of it to use one of the autoconf2.* perhaps. As it is, it doesn't build with autoconf2.5[4]. If you try it, you get a whole lecture from autoheader about the "deprecated and discouraged

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-23 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:47:18PM -0800, Mike O'Brien wrote: > > On Dec 23, 2005, at 2:34 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > > >Mike O'Brien wrote: > >[] > >>All it did was build the .deb package again. I swear > >>autoconf.info has been moved out of the > >>way. In fact I did a "find" and moved a

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-23 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Dec 23, 2005, at 2:34 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Mike O'Brien wrote: [] All it did was build the .deb package again. I swear autoconf.info has been moved out of the way. In fact I did a "find" and moved all occurrances of it in all trees out of the way. Well, it is the season to beli

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike O'Brien wrote: [] All it did was build the .deb package again. I swear autoconf.info has been moved out of the way. In fact I did a "find" and moved all occurrances of it in all trees out of the way. Well, it is the season to believe in Father Christmas and virgins giving birth :-) But

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-23 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Dec 23, 2005, at 1:01 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Mike O'Brien wrote: On Dec 22, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: [] To find out which package requires autoconf, I would do the following: Rename the autconf.info files to something else, like [] Then repeat your update-all comma

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike O'Brien wrote: On Dec 22, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: [] To find out which package requires autoconf, I would do the following: Rename the autconf.info files to something else, like [] Then repeat your update-all command and see who is complaining. --Martin After doing

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Dec 22, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Mike O'Brien wrote: [] I don't care which version of autoconf I use - frankly I'd like to get rid of "autoconf" in favor of "autoconf.2.5" but fink won't let me. Here is the entirety of the output when I run "fink update-all": [] The f

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Daniel Macks
I just removed all uses of the old "autoconf" package from 10.3 and 10.4T unstable. So assuming one has unstable enabled and not trying to build a package that exists in stable but not in unstable, I think this problem is about to recede into history... On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:58:51PM +0100, Ma

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike O'Brien wrote: [] I don't care which version of autoconf I use - frankly I'd like to get rid of "autoconf" in favor of "autoconf.2.5" but fink won't let me. Here is the entirety of the output when I run "fink update-all": [] The following 237 packages will be installed or updated: amor a

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Dec 22, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Mike O'Brien wrote: [] Ok, here goes: [BuffyBox:/sw/etc] obrien# fink --version Package manager version: 0.24.11 Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync [BuffyBox:/sw/etc] obrien# fink install autoconf Information about 5254 packages read in 2 seco

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike O'Brien wrote: [] Ok, here goes: [BuffyBox:/sw/etc] obrien# fink --version Package manager version: 0.24.11 Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync [BuffyBox:/sw/etc] obrien# fink install autoconf Information about 5254 packages read in 2 seconds. The package 'autoconf' will be installed. The fo

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Dec 22, 2005, at 12:08 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Mike O'Brien wrote: I'm doing a "fink update-all". If I deinstall both versions of autoconf (autoconf and autoconf2.5), it installs autconf2.5, then tries to install autoconf and bombs. If I install autoconf, it removes it, installs

Re: [Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike O'Brien wrote: I'm doing a "fink update-all". If I deinstall both versions of autoconf (autoconf and autoconf2.5), it installs autconf2.5, then tries to install autoconf and bombs. If I install autoconf, it removes it, installs autconf2.5, installs several other things, tries to reins

[Fink-users] autoconf dependency loop

2005-12-21 Thread Mike O'Brien
I'm doing a "fink update-all". If I deinstall both versions of autoconf (autoconf and autoconf2.5), it installs autconf2.5, then tries to install autoconf and bombs. If I install autoconf, it removes it, installs autconf2.5, installs several other things, tries to reinstall autoconf and bo