Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On 3/1/14 9:01 PM, Richard Miles wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2014, at 8:36 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> r-base=3.0.2-2 > sudo fink install r-base=3.0.2-2 > Scanning package description files.. > Information about 12718 packages read in 4 seconds. > Failed: no package found for specification 'r

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On Mar 1, 2014, at 8:36 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > r-base=3.0.2-2 sudo fink install r-base=3.0.2-2 Scanning package description files.. Information about 12718 packages read in 4 seconds. Failed: no package found for specification 'r-base=3.0.2-2'! ---

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On 3/1/14 7:19 PM, Richard Miles wrote: > Your mail to 'Fink-users' with the subject > > Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message body

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

Your mail to 'Fink-users' with the subject Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 212906 bytes with a limit of 40 KB Either the message will get posted t

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On 3/1/14 4:42 PM, Richard Miles wrote: > I use fink > commander and the output from the effort will be to large for an email :( > How about *not* using Fink Commander, then, so that it's easier to get the output? Try "fink install r-base30". Without seeing the *full* error message it is uncle

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

I use fink commander and the output from the effort will be to large for an email :( On Mar 1, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 3/1/14 1:18 PM, Richard Miles wrote: >> >> On Mar 1, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >> Nope it still fails to install. >> unmet depe

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On 3/1/14 1:18 PM, Richard Miles wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >>> > Nope it still fails to install. > unmet dependencies > > Richard Miles > r.godzi...@comcast.net > > > We're not mind readers, so a vague description of what's going on isn't useful. Can you p

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On Mar 1, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> Nope it still fails to install. unmet dependencies Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified too

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

OS version 10.6.8 on an Imac bash-4.2$ fink list -t x11 Information about 12718 packages read in 11 seconds. i akonadi-x11 1.4.0-6 PIM Storage Service i akonadi-x11-dev 1.4.0-6 Akonadi development headers and libs i akonadi-x11-shlibs 1.4.0-6 Shared libraries for Akonadi

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On 3/1/14 7:48 AM, Richard Miles wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> OS 10.6.8 > > Information about 12718 packages read in 8 seconds. > p x11 [virtual package] > p x11-dev [virtual package] > i x11-protocol-pm 0.56-2 X Window Syst

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On Mar 1, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > OS 10.6.8 Information about 12718 packages read in 8 seconds. i akonadi-x11 1.4.0-6 PIM Storage Service i akonadi-x11-dev 1.4.0-6 Akonadi development headers and libs i akonadi-x11-shlibs 1.4.0-6 Shared libraries fo

Re: [Fink-users] r-base install problems

On 3/1/14 5:29 AM, Richard Miles wrote: > I tried to install rbase-60 but ran into these problems: > xvfb-run: Depends: x11 but it is not installable. For Fink users, this > often means that you have attempted to install a package from the binary > distribution which depends on a "Restrictive"

[Fink-users] r-base install problems

I tried to install rbase-60 but ran into these problems: xvfb-run: Depends: x11 but it is not installable. For Fink users, this often means that you have attempted to install a package from the binary distribution which depends on a "Restrictive" package. See