Re: [Fink-users] Samba

2012-04-12 Thread Robert Wyatt
Alexander Hansen wrote: > Editing /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/smbd.plist to replace > /usr/sbin/smbd with /sw/sbin/smbd should cover your machine's SMB server. > > I'm not sure exactly what one would need to do at the _client_ side, > e.g. to have the Finder use Fink's samba3 rather than the bu

Re: [Fink-users] Samba

2012-04-12 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 4/12/12 11:57 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote: > Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 4/12/12 10:36 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>> On 4/12/12 10:04 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote: My ISO (information security office) is requiring me (it says "recommends" below--but that's not what they really mean) to update

Re: [Fink-users] Samba

2012-04-12 Thread Robert Wyatt
Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 4/12/12 10:36 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 4/12/12 10:04 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote: >>> My ISO (information security office) is requiring me (it says >>> "recommends" below--but that's not what they really mean) to update my >>> Samba installation on a MacOS 10.5 mach

Re: [Fink-users] Samba

2012-04-12 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 4/12/12 10:36 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 4/12/12 10:04 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote: >> My ISO (information security office) is requiring me (it says >> "recommends" below--but that's not what they really mean) to update my >> Samba installation on a MacOS 10.5 machine that I have. >> >> Current

Re: [Fink-users] Samba

2012-04-12 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 4/12/12 10:04 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote: > My ISO (information security office) is requiring me (it says > "recommends" below--but that's not what they really mean) to update my > Samba installation on a MacOS 10.5 machine that I have. > > Currently fink offers Samba3 at version: 3.6.0. > > ---

[Fink-users] Samba

2012-04-12 Thread Robert Wyatt
My ISO (information security office) is requiring me (it says "recommends" below--but that's not what they really mean) to update my Samba installation on a MacOS 10.5 machine that I have. Currently fink offers Samba3 at version: 3.6.0. -- Steps for Remediation -

[Fink-users] samba under 10.1

2003-07-20 Thread Gregory Seidman
I am still running 10.1, so I used Fink to install samba. I'd like to set it up to share home directories with the normal users' passwords, and nothing else. Is there a simple way of doing so? --Greg --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM W

Re: [Fink-users] Samba from Fink

2003-06-09 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
On Saturday, June 7, 2003, at 02:54 PM, Christopher Molnar wrote: Hello, I am trying to wrap up my migration from a old Linux server to my brand new OS/X server. One of my last remaining items is to re-create my domain server on the os/x box. Unfortunatly the samba that ships with osx seems t

[Fink-users] Samba from Fink

2003-06-07 Thread Christopher Molnar
Hello, I am trying to wrap up my migration from a old Linux server to my brand new OS/X server. One of my last remaining items is to re-create my domain server on the os/x box. Unfortunatly the samba that ships with osx seems to be severely disabled, it is almost impossible to add shares, crea

Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink

2003-01-30 Thread John Benin
PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink > Looks OK. Try running "fink index", and see if samba is available in > your listings. > > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 15:17, John Benin wrote: > > stable/crypto is already included in my trees. Here is my fink.c

Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
From: Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 30 Jan 2003 16:27:12 -0500 > To: John Benin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink > > > Looks OK. Try running "fink index", and see if samba is available in > > your listings.

Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
MirrorContinent: nam > >MirrorCountry: nam-us > >ProxyPassiveFTP: true > >Verbose: 0 > > Should I have to change this? > > - Original Message - > From: Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 30 Jan 2003 14:51:24 -0500 > To: John Benin

Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink

2003-01-30 Thread David Orlovich
isn't samba part of OS X anyway? David. On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 07:24 AM, John Benin wrote: I have already checked the archives, and the last message posted about this topic was back in August of 2002, so I am sending this checking to see if they're are any updates to the situation.

Re: [Fink-users] samba and fink

2003-01-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
It's stable, but not in the binary distribution. You'll have to install it from source. Check out http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/users-guide/packages.php#src On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 13:24, John Benin wrote: > I have already checked the archives, and the last message posted about this topic >wa

[Fink-users] samba and fink

2003-01-30 Thread John Benin
I have already checked the archives, and the last message posted about this topic was back in August of 2002, so I am sending this checking to see if they're are any updates to the situation. I am trying to install Samba using Fink. I checked the package list, and it says that is't not present

Re: [Fink-users] samba

2002-08-12 Thread Matt Stephenson
Samba at the moment isn't available as a binary through apt-get, you have to build it from source. Do 'fink selfupdate-cvs' to update to the latest packages as samba has just being moved to stable, then 'fink install samba' should do the trick. You will need the developer tools installed. Che

[Fink-users] samba

2002-08-12 Thread PJ Lansbergen
I suppose this one has been asked before but can't find a solution Samba seems available in the Fink - packages database but if I use apt-get it wan't find it. If I type fink list it wan't find it either. Everything else works just great. Herebelow is my (standard) source.list # Default A