On 17/06/14 00:17, Sean Lake wrote:
[]
Kernel/Types/tree.hpp:87:15: error: friend declaration specifying a default
argument must be a definition
friend void print_tree (tree t, int tab=0);
^
1 error generated.
This should be fixed now in 1.0.7.20-2.
--
Martin
On Jun 18, 2014, at 0:34, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
On 17/06/14 00:17, Sean Lake wrote:
[]
Kernel/Types/tree.hpp:87:15: error: friend declaration specifying a default
argument must be a definition
friend void print_tree (tree t, int tab=0);
^
1 error
On Jun 17, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
Weird. It looks like the logic in the CompileScript isn't doing the right
thing. Maybe insert some sort of diagnostic output between the tests to see
what's going on there?
Well, this is odd.
I was
I've tried a number of times the following combination:
fink selfupdate
fink update-all
but each time it ends as shown in the log below. Could someone please
diagnose what is wrong, and tell me how to fix it?
Thanks in advance,
Lowell Tacconi-Garman
[vpn-44-230:~] ltacconi% fink update-all
(Changing the subject to something more specific so that other people
having this problem can find the thread more easily. update-all isn't
really the relevant problem here, because a specific package is to blame.)
On 6/18/14, 4:34 AM, Lowell Tacconi-Garman wrote:
I've tried a number of
Charles,
Do you happen to have logs of the ppl9 builds that passed and
failed?
Fang
On Jun 17, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
Weird. It looks like the logic in the CompileScript isn't doing the right
thing. Maybe insert some sort of
On Jun 18, 2014, at 3:56 PM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote:
Do you happen to have logs of the ppl9 builds that passed and failed?
No, sorry, just the fragments that I posted. I was not expecting it to pass
without help.
I'll try rebuilding it now to get the passing logs.
Maybe
On Jun 18, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2014, at 3:56 PM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote:
Do you happen to have logs of the ppl9 builds that passed and failed?
No, sorry, just the fragments that I posted. I was not expecting it to pass
