I guess I corrupted my python packages with pip install and only removing all
packages and python2.7, reinstalling and rebuilding python27 (necessary step)
recovered my setup.Thanks!
On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 3:15 AM, Daniel Johnson
daniel.johnso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 8,
On Jun 9, 2015, at 16:31, Ben Abbott bpabb...@mac.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 7:06 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 16:02, Sunil Shah ssha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexander,
What is the plan to get octave 4.0. on fink?
Thanks,
Hi Alexander,
What is the plan to get octave 4.0. on fink?
Thanks,
Sunil
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Alexander Hansen
alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2015, at 16:28, Ben Abbott bpabb...@mac.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2015, at 10:53 PM, Alexander Hansen
Is octave 3.8.2 is the last official version for fink on the latest mac
osx? Or, are you waiting for some other dependency to resolve the issue?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Alexander Hansen
alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 16:02, Sunil Shah ssha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 7:06 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 16:02, Sunil Shah ssha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexander,
What is the plan to get octave 4.0. on fink?
Thanks,
Sunil
The last thing I heard was that it wouldn’t build with
On Jun 9, 2015, at 18:48, Sunil Shah ssha...@gmail.com wrote:
I should have been careful in my statement about what worked for me.
I am trying to understand the problem you referred to about octave 4.0.0 not
building on clang++.
I have been quite impressed with the performance of
On Jun 9, 2015, at 17:44, Sunil Shah ssha...@gmail.com wrote:
Octave 3.8.2.6 did build with the -dev version on OSX 10.10.3 (latest
production release) on fink 0.38.5
There’s no -dev version. -dev means “contains stuff used for development, but
not needed at runtime”, like headers and
Octave 3.8.2.6 did build with the -dev version on OSX 10.10.3 (latest
production release) on fink 0.38.5
Most of my octave code runs faster on the octave 3.8.2.x build on iMacs
(late 2011, 4 core intel) than on Octave 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 36 core fastest
Amazon AWS EC2 instance (c4.8xlarge with SSD
I should have been careful in my statement about what worked for me.
I am trying to understand the problem you referred to about octave 4.0.0
not building on clang++.
I have been quite impressed with the performance of Octave code on Mac OSX
using fink. My tests used octave382-atlas-qtmac
On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Sunil Shah ssha...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, as you imply in your last email, if the default octave variant uses
clang already, what is the issue with octave 4.0.0 and clang++? Or is it a
new issue in octave 4.0.0 in moving from 3.8.2?
Yes. The problem is that the
10 matches
Mail list logo
