> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Sunil Shah <ssha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Now, as you imply in your last email, if the default "octave" variant uses
> clang already, what is the issue with octave 4.0.0 and clang++? Or is it a
> new issue in octave 4.0.0 in moving from 3.8.2?
Yes. The problem is that the 4.0.0 code isn’t compatible with Apple’s clang.
Ben
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
