Hi All,
I have a problem where I would want to specify fixed value boundary
conditions for times t=t0. The way I've implemented this is:
a.constrain(a_0,(mesh.exteriorFaces))
while t = t0:
a.faceGrad.constrain(0.,mesh.exteriorFaces)
eq.solve(dt=timeStepDuration)
t+=dt
Hi,
For some reason my fipy conda installation stopped running. I've
removed it and installed it again but I keep getting the same error:
>>> import fipy
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File
Hi,
Is there any example on how to use the different steppers? Any
documentation on possible advantages/disadvantages of each one?
Thanks,
Adrian.
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY:
Jon
Here is the error message I get when I try to run the Anaconda
installation of FiPy using Trilinos on OsX. I'm using El Capitan:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "CH_SqMesh.py", line 8, in
import fipy as fp
File
) and worked for a couple of people I was at a workshop with.
> If you've done this since then, I'd appreciate knowing what doesn't work.
>
> - Jon
>
>> On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Adrian Jacobo <ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
&g
Hi,
I'm trying to speed up the Cahn-Hilliard example by running it in
parallel but the running time is always the same regardless of how many
processors I use. I'm using FiPy in Linux installed from Anaconda (I
tried the same installation in OsX but trillinos doesn't work) following
the
Hi,
I'm trying to solve a system where an equation for a field is
coupled to an equation for a scalar. But I'm having problems writing
this into FiPy. To illustrate the point here I show you a simplified
version of the equations I'm trying to solve:
Hi,
Is there a simple way to implement an adaptive time step in Fipy?
More specifically, is there a way that, when calling the solve
function store the time advanced fields in temporary variables?, so that
the evolution can be recalculated using a different time step (and then
comparing
the
available memory in the system and crashes.
Cheers,
Adrian.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Adrian Jacobo
ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu mailto:ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu
wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems when saving results of a calculation on a
Gmsh grid when running
Hi,
I'm having problems when saving results of a calculation on a Gmsh
grid when running in parallel. I've attached an example of the problem,
based on the diffusion/circle.py example. The code
test_circle_parallel.py runs the diffusion equation on a circle and
then saves the result to a
Sorry! I saw that was a bug with Numpy and I didn't pay that you where
having problems with the viewer too.
Have a look to my previous email about numpy 1.7 bug !!!
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST
memory, and crashes).
Thank you so much for all your help! sorry to bother you with so many
questions!
Adrian.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Adrian Jacobo
ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu mailto:ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your help. I gave up trying to make
As you suspected, I've installed openmpi using macports, and this
might be the source of the problem. Here I send you the result of 'otool
-L' for the mpi4py and PyTrilinos libraries.
otool -L
MPI_C_COMPILER and MPI_CXX_COMPILER
options when calling cmake, but it tells me is not using those values)
Adrian.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Adrian Jacobo
ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu mailto:ajac...@mail.rockefeller.edu
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know this might not be the right place
Hi everyone,
I know this might not be the right place to ask, but may be someone
can give me a hint.
I'm trying to install Trilinos in OSX Mountain Lion, to use it with
fipy. I tried following the instructions in fipy's manual, but the
trilinos installation gives an error, saying that it
Thanks! That's what I was looking for, and it seems to work fine
(although having to use an arbitrary large value to define the implicit
source is not very elegant, but it does what I need to)
Adrian.
Hi Adrian,
I'm not sure if this is what you're going for, but perhaps you could
use an
Hi Pierre,
Thank you for your suggestion, I now implemented a quick and dirty
version fixing the value of the field at the required points, but what
you suggest seems like a more elegant solution, I will try it later and
see how it compares.
Adrian.
Hello,
In general, defining a singular
Hi,
I'm trying to solve the following equations:
And I'm defining the system in this way:
mesh = fp.Grid3D(dx=dx,
dy=dy,dz=dz, nx=nx, ny=ny,nz=nz)
C = fp.CellVariable(name = "Calcium",mesh =
mesh, value = 0.)
B
Not for me. If you're seeing something else, then it may come down to either
boundary conditions or parameter values. We probably need to see a minimal
script that exhibits what you're seeing.
I send you attached a minimal script that shows one of the problems
I'm having. Now I'm solving
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
I'm solving an equation in 3d and I need to calculate the integral of the
field. What is the most convenient/fast way of doing this?
int = var.cellVolumeAverage * var.mesh.numberOfCells
Just to clarify, as it might be useful for somebody else, this
Hi all,
I'm solving an equation in 3d and I need to calculate the integral of
the field. What is the most convenient/fast way of doing this?
A related question: how can I access individual points of the field?
Right now, to access the point C(x,y,z) I'm doing C(((x,),(y,),(z,))),
where C is
21 matches
Mail list logo