Re: 2D anisotropic unstructured mesh and non-classical FV schemes

>> If you wish to use an unstructured Delaunay mesh, it has >> to be isotropic (equilateral triangles) or near-isotropic otherwise >> the control volume calculation will result in overlaps and the >> conservation property will be violated (the solution would more likely >> be incorrect). > >

Re: 2D anisotropic unstructured mesh and non-classical FV schemes

Daniel is much better versed in the nuances of FV schemes than I am, but I did want to question one assertion you made: > On Oct 16, 2017, at 6:16 PM, F Hssn wrote: > > If you wish to use an unstructured Delaunay mesh, it has > to be isotropic (equilateral triangles) or

Re: 2D anisotropic unstructured mesh and non-classical FV schemes

> What is an anisotropic mesh? By anisotropic, I mean the mesh having low-quality triangles (skinny triangles, as opposed to equilateral triangles), strategically oriented so they reduce the number of vertices required but do not negatively affect the resolution of the functions or solutions

Re: 2D anisotropic unstructured mesh and non-classical FV schemes

Thanks for your interest in FiPy On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:16 PM, F Hssn wrote: > > So my questions are: > > - Does fipy handle anisotropic unstructured meshes without any > problem? (I'm specifically looking to use bamg for 2D mesh adaptation > based on interpolation error