Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3.0 Bug in nested join

2013-03-25 Thread Thomas Beckmann
Thanks alot, Dimitry, I didn't know about the new (SQL spec conforming) restirction you mentioned in your prior post! Thomas > Sorry, I thought that your issue was caused by the i.RDB$RELATION_NAME = > rf.RDB$RELATION_NAME condition, but it's not. So there's only one error > and it's explained

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3.0 Bug in nested join

2013-03-25 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
26.03.2013 7:42, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > This was an intended change which probably became an overkill. I will > report back after closer investigation. Sorry, I thought that your issue was caused by the i.RDB$RELATION_NAME = rf.RDB$RELATION_NAME condition, but it's not. So there's only one erro

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3.0 Bug in nested join

2013-03-25 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
26.03.2013 3:33, Thomas Beckmann wrote: > It seems to me we have a bug in nested joins: > > Consider the statement below. It's supposed to show foreign key fields > which it does nicely with FB2.5. With 3.0 you'll get the error "Column > unknown. RF.RDB$FIELD_NAME. At line 11, column 32." - this i

[Firebird-devel] FB3.0 Bug in nested join

2013-03-25 Thread Thomas Beckmann
It seems to me we have a bug in nested joins: Consider the statement below. It's supposed to show foreign key fields which it does nicely with FB2.5. With 3.0 you'll get the error "Column unknown. RF.RDB$FIELD_NAME. At line 11, column 32." - this is the postponed on clause (i.RDB$RELATION_NAME = r

Re: [Firebird-devel] autoconf/automake/libtool warnings

2013-03-25 Thread marius adrian popa
rename is done , please test for any breakings On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Treeve Jelbert wrote: > recent version of autoconf/automake/libtool complain about the firebird > scripts > > > aclocal: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac', not > 'configure.in' > libtoolize: put

Re: [Firebird-devel] Patch to supress a "C4390" warning

2013-03-25 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/24/13 10:22, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 19.03.2013 9:54, Dmitry Kovalenko wrote: >> Try to compile your "right way" with fourth level (/W4) compiler warnings :) > I've committed a solution that's expected to solve both issues. > Hopefully, it compiles on Linux :-) > Yes, it does. :) --

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4069) isql under windows: different behaviour on Ctrl-BREAK depending on whether it currently performs some job or no

2013-03-25 Thread Pavel Zotov (JIRA)
isql under windows: different behaviour on Ctrl-BREAK depending on whether it currently performs some job or no --- Key: CORE-4069 URL: http://tracker.fire