On 26-1-2016 20:08, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> 26.01.2016 20:50, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> On 23-1-2016 13:16, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>>> 23.01.2016 12:54, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>>
I have not received any response to the e-mail below. Does this mean my
concern is deemed unimportant?
>>>
>>> We
26.01.2016 20:50, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 23-1-2016 13:16, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> 23.01.2016 12:54, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>
>>> I have not received any response to the e-mail below. Does this mean my
>>> concern is deemed unimportant?
>>
>> We may fix it in the B2_1 branch, but we won't be re
On 23-1-2016 13:16, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 23.01.2016 12:54, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> I have not received any response to the e-mail below. Does this mean my
>> concern is deemed unimportant?
>
> We may fix it in the B2_1 branch, but we won't be releasing the new
> binaries.
Should I create a t
On 26-1-2016 18:52, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>
>> The main reason it was not done are usage patterns. -F switch is needed in 2
>> cases:
>> - After restoring backup of database using non-nbackup tools (i.e.
>> someone does: alter database begin backup; copies db-file using some non-
>> firebird tools; al
> The main reason it was not done are usage patterns. -F switch is needed in 2
> cases:
> - After restoring backup of database using non-nbackup tools (i.e.
> someone does: alter database begin backup; copies db-file using some non-
> firebird tools; alter database end backup) and after is wants t
Simple query very slow on table with blob sub_type 0
Key: CORE-5086
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5086
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Engine
OK, safe primes are "better" than ordinary primes in theory. But as I
said, in practice, the strength of the authentication is based on the
two random numbers, which are not exchanged. Any weakness of the price,
group, or generator is of use for breaking the verifier, not the
authentication o
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:35:53 -0500, James Starkey
wrote:
> Is there any reasons to believe there are unsafe SRP primes?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5054:
The group parameters (N, g) sent in this message MUST have N as a
safe prime (a prime of the form N=2q+1, where q is also prime). Th
On 01/26/2016 04:35 PM, James Starkey wrote:
> Is there any reasons to believe there are unsafe SRP primes?
>
> The magnitude of the prime is a consideration when trying to break a
> verifier, but the security of the handshake is more dependent on the
> quality of the session specific random number
Is there any reasons to believe there are unsafe SRP primes?
The magnitude of the prime is a consideration when trying to break a
verifier, but the security of the handshake is more dependent on the
quality of the session specific random numbers generated in each side of a
connection.
In any case
On 01/26/2016 04:10 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> looking at
> https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/core/blob/master/src/auth/SecureRemotePassword/srp.cpp#L14
> and wondering how was this number selected? Is it a safe prime number
> for SRP? Some might not be. Just wondering.
>
src/auth/SecureRemo
Hi *,
looking at
https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/core/blob/master/src/auth/SecureRemotePassword/srp.cpp#L14
and wondering how was this number selected? Is it a safe prime number
for SRP? Some might not be. Just wondering.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
---
Allow to fixup (nbackup) database via Services API
--
Key: CORE-5085
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5085
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: AP
> If you think we need it we may add such service in FB4.
OK, added as CORE-5085. I've used "Minor" priority.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
On 01/26/2016 03:25 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> restore that copy. But this anyway requires access to server console,
>> i.e. command line nbackup can be used.
> Agreed. The "problem" is that you need to call the executable. Which
> opens a lot of potential failures and problems to handle - like loc
> restore that copy. But this anyway requires access to server console,
> i.e. command line nbackup can be used.
Agreed. The "problem" is that you need to call the executable. Which
opens a lot of potential failures and problems to handle - like locating
the executable etc. With API it's easier t
Database-level trigger (at least on CONNECT and DISCONNECT events) does not
fire on SuperServer (and ONLY on that arch.) and connection is made via ES/EDS
---
On 01/26/2016 01:57 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> No.
> So the only option left is modify the file manually? Which of course
> only works if the file is accessible for .NET provider.
>
> Is it worth adding it to tracker or is it something CORE is not going to
> do?
>
Adding nbackup -F to services is
>IIRC, nbackup can be called via services. Does it include -F?
That's what I'd like to have. But it looks like it doesn't.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility
On 01/26/2016 01:58 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 26.01.2016 11:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 01/26/2016 01:11 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:42:41 +0100, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
is there a way to execute same stuff as `nbackup -F` i.e. via (running)
26.01.2016 11:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 01:11 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:42:41 +0100, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>>> Hi *,
>>>
>>> is there a way to execute same stuff as `nbackup -F` i.e. via (running)
>>> server? Something that I could call from .NET provider to
> No.
So the only option left is modify the file manually? Which of course
only works if the file is accessible for .NET provider.
Is it worth adding it to tracker or is it something CORE is not going to
do?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
---
On 01/26/2016 01:11 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:42:41 +0100, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> Hi *,
>>
>> is there a way to execute same stuff as `nbackup -F` i.e. via (running)
>> server? Something that I could call from .NET provider to offer this to
>> customers.
> As far as I can
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:42:41 +0100, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> is there a way to execute same stuff as `nbackup -F` i.e. via (running)
> server? Something that I could call from .NET provider to offer this to
> customers.
As far as I can tell from the NBackup documentation, nbackup -F works
On 01/26/2016 11:42 AM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> is there a way to execute same stuff as `nbackup -F` i.e. via (running)
> server? Something that I could call from .NET provider to offer this to
> customers.
>
No.
---
Hi *,
is there a way to execute same stuff as `nbackup -F` i.e. via (running)
server? Something that I could call from .NET provider to offer this to
customers.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Site24x
26 matches
Mail list logo
