On Fri, Aug 9, 2019, at 17:59, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> call) but getting long transaction numbers from e.g. isc_database_info()
> may show surprises.
Correct.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
09.08.2019 18:39, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
to testing client libraries and client side applications.
What would be tested in client library?
You started this thread because you wanted to test a client library, so
you should already know reason for testing a client library.
I think he was
On 2019-08-09 13:29, Jiří Činčura wrote:
to testing client libraries and client side applications.
What would be tested in client library?
You started this thread because you wanted to test a client library, so
you should already know reason for testing a client library.
Mark
I have tested it before and now also.
gbak -c -v -START 123456789
and database after restore looks like
Database header page information:
Flags 0
Checksum12345
Write timestamp Aug 9, 2019 15:17:08
Page size
In case, that you use transaction ID for business logic and needs to
only going up.
Slavek
Ing. Slavomir Skopalik
Executive Head
Elekt Labs s.r.o.
MASA - Collection and evaluation of data from machines and laboratories
http://eng.elektlabs.cz/products-and-services/masa
09.08.2019 13:19, liviuslivius wrote:
But it is as an options listed in "gbak -?"
I'm afraid that meaning of this switch could be a little different from what you
propose and it sets starting transaction for recovery from journal.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
>>You mean for transaction handle?
This really depend what client library do.
I do not go into details about client libraries which i do not write, but i am
talking abut transaction numbers.
This was only sample where it can be usefull.
For me it will be usefull in application developement.
> If it is working ok in such situation like "id" greater then integer
> and some code in the library can have e.g. variable declared as
> integer.
You mean for transaction handle?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
>>What would be tested in client library?If it is working ok in such situation
>>like "id" greater then integer and some code in the library can have e.g.
>>variable declared as integer. Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
nullFirebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
I do not remember where i found this info before, i can't find it now to show
details about.
But it is as an options listed in "gbak -?"
-A(RCHIVE_DATABASE) backup database to archive
-ARCHIVE_J(OURNALS) backup journals to archive
-ARCHIVE_R(ECOVER)recover database from archive
> to testing client libraries and client side applications.
What would be tested in client library?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
>>Other than engine debug of greater IDs, what would this be used for?
to testing client libraries and client side applications.
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
09.08.2019 12:37, liviuslivius wrote:
i have checked this now and i see this was in Interbase:
-START(ING_TRANS) starting transaction ID for restore
I don't see such option in Interbase XE7 documentation. Could you provide a
link?
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
On 09/08/2019 07:37, liviuslivius wrote:
> Hi
>
> i have checked this now and i see this was in Interbase:
> -START(ING_TRANS) starting transaction ID for restore
>
> Maybe it is time to add this also to Firebird?
>
Other than engine debug of greater IDs, what would this be used for?
Hi
i have checked this now and i see this was in Interbase:
-START(ING_TRANS) starting transaction ID for restore
Maybe it is time to add this also to Firebird?
Should i create such ticket in the tracker?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
W dniu 2019-08-04 17:00:11 użytkownik
Hii remember that was a switch in gbak restore, to restore db with next
transaction set for specified value. But maybe this was Interbase not Firebird
i have not access to the computer nowRegards,Karol Bieniaszewski
nullFirebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
>Set FW=OFF, MaxUnflushedWrites = -1, MaxUnflushedWriteTime = -1
Interestingly settings the MaxUnflushedXxx does not have a significant effect.
In case somebody is doing the same... Using 2 connections/threads seems to be
the sweetspot on my machine.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
01.08.2019 11:52, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
this might seem silly, but is there a very fast way to generate transactions in
Firebird? I'm trying to test new bigger transaction IDs in .NET provider. As
far as I know using multiple connections in parallel is not going to help. So
far I'm doing
Oh yeah. Forced writes help a bit.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Hi *,
this might seem silly, but is there a very fast way to generate transactions in
Firebird? I'm trying to test new bigger transaction IDs in .NET provider. As
far as I know using multiple connections in parallel is not going to help. So
far I'm doing simple execute block:
execute block
as
20 matches
Mail list logo
