Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 16.09.2021 12:21:
In new version we can easily change MessageBuffer format.
Or we can return XSQLDA to OO API and deprecate MessageBuffer repeating
evolution of ISC API.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sour
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 16.09.2021 12:21:
In new version we can easily change MessageBuffer format. The main issue is old
user's binaries - probably to support them we will need some tricks in remote
redirector & copy/in/out in dsql.cpp.
This trick could be "use offsets from p
On 9/16/21 1:00 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 16.09.2021 11:52:
First of all it's good to know what places are affected. Do not want
to try to guess them.
ODS
The most strightforward solution for FB5 is new major ODS. For FB4 I see
only one solution
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 16.09.2021 11:52:
First of all it's good to know what places are affected. Do not want to try to
guess them.
ODS and MessageBuffer at least. Record is an internal thing and can be
ignored.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 9/16/21 12:18 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 13.09.2021 9:39:
Yes, that should be fixed. If one builds FB with native __int128 it
fails on unaligned data access. But changing alignment requirement to
16 bytes is not enough - appears some buffers are no
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 13.09.2021 9:39:
Yes, that should be fixed. If one builds FB with native __int128 it fails on
unaligned data access. But changing alignment requirement to 16 bytes is not
enough - appears some buffers are not aligned at 16-bit cause FB fails exactly
in t
On 9/12/21 6:40 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 15.05.2018 12:13:
On 05/15/18 13:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
15.05.2018 11:58, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Do alignment of fields in C struct matches alignment of the same
fields in MessageBuff
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 15.05.2018 12:13:
On 05/15/18 13:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
15.05.2018 11:58, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Do alignment of fields in C struct matches alignment of the same fields in
MessageBuffer?
If at compile/preprocess time construct a
On 05/15/18 13:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
15.05.2018 11:58, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Do alignment of fields in C struct matches alignment of the same
fields in MessageBuffer?
If at compile/preprocess time construct a struct to be used
directly in OO API, will it be reliabl
15.05.2018 11:58, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Do alignment of fields in C struct matches alignment of the same fields in
MessageBuffer?
If at compile/preprocess time construct a struct to be used directly in OO API, will
it be reliable?
Not always. For example, on 32-bit linu
On 05/15/18 12:55, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hello, All.
Do alignment of fields in C struct matches alignment of the same
fields in MessageBuffer?
If at compile/preprocess time construct a struct to be used directly
in OO API, will it be reliable?
Not always. For example, on 32-bit li
Hello, All.
Do alignment of fields in C struct matches alignment of the same fields in
MessageBuffer?
If at compile/preprocess time construct a struct to be used directly in OO API, will it
be reliable?
--
WBR, SD.
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
