On 02/10/17 21:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 14:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 10.02.2017 16:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> Firebird BLR must be improved to be easier to read (the code), to be
>>> easier to generate and parse and to be extensible.
>> Why
On 10/02/2017 14:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 10.02.2017 16:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Firebird BLR must be improved to be easier to read (the code), to be
>> easier to generate and parse and to be extensible.
>Why to improve something that must die?..
>
>
I don't see C++, Ja
On 02/10/17 19:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 10.02.2017 16:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Firebird BLR must be improved to be easier to read (the code), to be
>> easier to generate and parse and to be extensible.
> Why to improve something that must die?..
>
Really - may be it sh
10.02.2017 16:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Firebird BLR must be improved to be easier to read (the code), to be
> easier to generate and parse and to be extensible.
Why to improve something that must die?..
--
WBR, SD.
All,
Firebird BLR must be improved to be easier to read (the code), to be
easier to generate and parse and to be extensible.
See now, to add to INSERT, we already have blr_store
and blr_store2, both non extensible. It would require
blr_store3/blr_store4 or blr_store3 with custom logic to have op
