Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
17.09.2015 17:07, Paul Reeves wrote: > That's an idea. But the installer has always offered the option to choose the > architecture and I don't see any problem with continuing to provide that > support. But what for? KISS. -- WBR, SD. --

Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Paul Reeves
On Thursday 17 September 2015 16:45:46 Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 17.09.2015 16:32, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > > For v3, I'd say that the installer should be the only tool touching > > configuration file(s). > >I'd say that installer don't need to touch config file at all. >Version 3 has SMP-

Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
17.09.2015 17:38, Paul Reeves wrote: > Out of interest - why do you think the cpl applet must die? Because most users don't use it. And those who rarely do (newbies, I suppose) spam our tracker with "not working in Win7", "not working in Win8", now probably "not working in Win10" ;-) Personall

Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Leyne, Sean
> > While I have no objections to the config API in general, I'd note that: > > (1) it's not instsvc business, (2) cpl applet must die, (3) I'm not > > sure we need any tool for this task. > > Out of interest - why do you think the cpl applet must die? What purpose do you think it fulfills? S

Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
17.09.2015 16:32, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > For v3, I'd say that the installer should be the only tool touching > configuration file(s). I'd say that installer don't need to touch config file at all. Version 3 has SMP-friendly superserver, right? It covers 99,99% of usage. The rest of users

Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Paul Reeves
On Thursday 17 September 2015 16:32:04 Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > > > > The first question is 'Do we want to allow instsvc (or other tools) to > > change architecture (ie, directly update firebird.conf)?' > > Surely not by instsvc, it has nothing to do with architectures now. OK. If anyone else has t

Re: [Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
17.09.2015 16:51, Paul Reeves wrote: > > I'm wondering what to do about instsvc and ServerMode on windows. Previously > instsvc was able to switch between the different architectures because all it > had to do was update the registry with the name of the relevant executable > and add the -m switch

[Firebird-devel] instsvc and ServerMode

2015-09-17 Thread Paul Reeves
I'm wondering what to do about instsvc and ServerMode on windows. Previously instsvc was able to switch between the different architectures because all it had to do was update the registry with the name of the relevant executable and add the -m switch if applicable. Now users need to edit fireb