On 23-4-2012 11:46, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 04/19/12 09:35, Александр Пешков wrote:
>>> It looks like Jaybird uses an authentication mechanism that is no longer
>>> supported with Firebird 3:
>>>
>>> Hex dump from wireshark for both Jaybird (fails) and Flamerobin
>>> (succeeds) is attached. Mos
25.04.2012 11:48, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> As far as I can see this change is not yet in the Windows snapshot build
> (just looking at the ChangeLog).
Windows snapshot builds were (and maybe still are) broken, so it may
take a day or so to recover them.
Dmitry
-
On 23-4-2012 11:46, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 04/19/12 09:35, Александр Пешков wrote:
>>> It looks like Jaybird uses an authentication mechanism that is no longer
>>> supported with Firebird 3:
>>>
>>> Hex dump from wireshark for both Jaybird (fails) and Flamerobin
>>> (succeeds) is attached. Mos
On 04/19/12 09:35, Александр Пешков wrote:
>> It looks like Jaybird uses an authentication mechanism that is no longer
>> supported with Firebird 3:
>>
>> Hex dump from wireshark for both Jaybird (fails) and Flamerobin
>> (succeeds) is attached. Most obvious thing I notice that Jaybird sends
>>
On 04/20/12 11:33, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:19:18 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
> wrote:
>>> I am going to think it over, not having to implement it is of course
> far
>>> easier.
>>>
>> The main problem is that I do not know good reason to waste time
>> implementing it ...
> The cha
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:19:18 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
wrote:
>> I am going to think it over, not having to implement it is of course
far
>> easier.
>>
>
> The main problem is that I do not know good reason to waste time
> implementing it ...
The challenge to get it to work of course ;)
>>> It's muc
On 04/20/12 11:10, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:40:29 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
> wrote:
>> On 04/19/12 22:48, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>> On 19-4-2012 10:17, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hash
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:40:29 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
wrote:
> On 04/19/12 22:48, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> On 19-4-2012 10:17, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>>> 19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>>
Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hashing algorithm, and
where
in the Firebird
On 04/19/12 22:48, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 19-4-2012 10:17, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> 19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hashing algorithm, and where
>>> in the Firebird sources can I find its implementation?
>> Something derived from DES,
On 19-4-2012 10:17, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hashing algorithm, and where
>> in the Firebird sources can I find its implementation?
>
> Something derived from DES, AFAIK. See ENC_crypt(), located in /src/jrd/
>
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:23:16 +0200, Kjell Rilbe
wrote:
> Den 2012-04-19 10:17 skrev Dmitry Yemanov såhär:
>> 19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hashing algorithm, and
>>> where
>>> in the Firebird sources can I find its implementation?
>> So
Den 2012-04-19 10:17 skrev Dmitry Yemanov såhär:
> 19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hashing algorithm, and where
>> in the Firebird sources can I find its implementation?
> Something derived from DES, AFAIK. See ENC_crypt(), located in /src/j
19.04.2012 12:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Ok, that sounds relatively easy. What is the hashing algorithm, and where
> in the Firebird sources can I find its implementation?
Something derived from DES, AFAIK. See ENC_crypt(), located in /src/jrd/
(pre-FB3) or in /src/common/ (trunk).
Dmitry
--
19.04.2012 12:59, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
> Do we really need to keep it?
We surely don't want all the existing Jaybird installations to stop working.
Dmitry
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Bounda
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:36:15 +0400, Dmitry Yemanov
wrote:
> 19.04.2012 11:22, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I also created a ticket to see if it is easy to change Jaybird
to
>> use the hashed authentication for Jaybird 2.2, but I don't want to do
>> major
>> changes in the wire protocol for
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Yemanov [mailto:firebi...@yandex.ru]
> Sent: Miércoles, 18 de Abril de 2012 23:58
>
> Nice catch. As far as I see, we don't support authentication
> with plain
> (unhashed) passwords anymore. I don't remember whether it was
> intended
> or not, but
19.04.2012 11:22, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Thanks. I also created a ticket to see if it is easy to change Jaybird to
> use the hashed authentication for Jaybird 2.2, but I don't want to do major
> changes in the wire protocol for Jaybird 2.2 (I had that planned for 2.3).
It has very little to do w
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:35:13 +0400, Александр Пешков
wrote:
>> It looks like Jaybird uses an authentication mechanism that is no
longer
>> supported with Firebird 3:
>>
>> Hex dump from wireshark for both Jaybird (fails) and Flamerobin
>> (succeeds) is attached. Most obvious thing I notice that
> It looks like Jaybird uses an authentication mechanism that is no longer
> supported with Firebird 3:
>
> Hex dump from wireshark for both Jaybird (fails) and Flamerobin
> (succeeds) is attached. Most obvious thing I notice that Jaybird sends
> the password in the clear and Flamerobin doesn't
19.04.2012 0:07, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> It looks like Jaybird uses an authentication mechanism that is no longer
> supported with Firebird 3:
>
> Hex dump from wireshark for both Jaybird (fails) and Flamerobin
> (succeeds) is attached. Most obvious thing I notice that Jaybird sends
> the password
On 18-4-2012 20:41, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 18-4-2012 20:39, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 18-4-2012 20:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
In the conf file I have uncommented:
AuthClient = Srp, Win_Sspi, Legacy_Auth
This is client setting.
Am I missing an additional step to get things working with
On 18-4-2012 20:39, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 18-4-2012 20:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> In the conf file I have uncommented:
>>> AuthClient = Srp, Win_Sspi, Legacy_Auth
>>
>> This is client setting.
>>
>>> Am I missing an additional step to get things working with legacy
>>> authentication?
>
On 18-4-2012 20:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> In the conf file I have uncommented:
>> AuthClient = Srp, Win_Sspi, Legacy_Auth
>
> This is client setting.
>
>> Am I missing an additional step to get things working with legacy
>> authentication?
>
> Add Legacy_Auth to the AuthServer setting
T
On 18-4-2012 20:20, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 18.04.2012 21:55, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> I just installed Firebird 3 from the Windows x64 zip kit, but I am
>> unable to authenticate using FlameRobin, or using Jaybird.
>
> What fbclient version is loaded by FlameRobin?
>
>> In the conf file I have u
> In the conf file I have uncommented:
> AuthClient = Srp, Win_Sspi, Legacy_Auth
This is client setting.
> Am I missing an additional step to get things working with legacy
> authentication?
Add Legacy_Auth to the AuthServer setting
Regards,
Vlad
-
18.04.2012 21:55, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> I just installed Firebird 3 from the Windows x64 zip kit, but I am
> unable to authenticate using FlameRobin, or using Jaybird.
What fbclient version is loaded by FlameRobin?
> In the conf file I have uncommented:
> AuthClient = Srp, Win_Sspi, Legacy_Aut
26 matches
Mail list logo
