Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
18.02.2019 17:18, liviuslivius wrote: If you consider to remove it in CS only... Nobody going to remove it, don't worry ;) Regards, Vlad Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread liviuslivius
If you consider to remove it in CS only...I need it in super server personally Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski nullFirebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 18/02/2019 08:47, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 18/02/2019 08:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >> >>   Seriously, if you (and others) consider it is important enough to >> try to refresh >> TIP cache in such cases - fill the ticket in tracker and i'll fix it. >> > If the change is going to app

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
18.02.2019 15:01, Vlad Khorsun wrote: Second, Beta1 tag is already set so we need DY's opinion on this subject. The tag will be moved today, but please don't commit before that. This (even if fixed/changed) is not a showstopper. Dmitry Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
18.02.2019 13:01, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote: Just notice - if you do not use this function you will never have performance issue with it. It depends on the place where Vlad will put the TIP refresh to. -- WBR, SD. Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://list

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
18.02.2019 13:50, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: 18.02.2019 12:47, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: If the change is going to appear only in Beta 2, then ok and I file a ticket. Otherwise a ticket would not be necessary as the feature didn't appeared in any alpha/beta release yet.   This change

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
On 2/18/19 2:57 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: 18.02.2019 12:55, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote: On the other hand this should better be fixed afterwards - design where SS/CS provide different results is IMHO not good. Something like awful borland's SPB items that provide useful results

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
18.02.2019 13:47, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: On 18/02/2019 08:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote:   Seriously, if you (and others) consider it is important enough to try to refresh TIP cache in such cases - fill the ticket in tracker and i'll fix it. If the change is going to appear only in Be

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
18.02.2019 12:55, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote: On the other hand this should better be fixed afterwards - design where SS/CS provide different results is IMHO not good. Something like awful borland's SPB items that provide useful results only in SS. Well Borland can be excused here so

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
On 2/18/19 2:47 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: On 18/02/2019 08:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote:   Seriously, if you (and others) consider it is important enough to try to refresh TIP cache in such cases - fill the ticket in tracker and i'll fix it. If the change is going to appear only in B

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
18.02.2019 12:47, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: If the change is going to appear only in Beta 2, then ok and I file a ticket. Otherwise a ticket would not be necessary as the feature didn't appeared in any alpha/beta release yet. This change AFAIU will make Firebird even slower than it

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 18/02/2019 08:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > > >   Seriously, if you (and others) consider it is important enough to > try to refresh > TIP cache in such cases - fill the ticket in tracker and i'll fix it. > If the change is going to appear only in Beta 2, then ok and I file a ticket. Otherwise a tic

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
18.02.2019 13:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: On 18/02/2019 05:50, Vlad Khorsun wrote: 18.02.2019 1:49, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: Open two connections C1 and C2. C2: select current_transaction from rdb$database; -- let's call the result T2 C2: commit; C1: select rdb$get_tran

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 18/02/2019 05:50, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > 18.02.2019 1:49, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> Open two connections C1 and C2. >> >> C2: select current_transaction from rdb$database; -- let's call the >> result T2 >> C2: commit; >> >> C1: select rdb$get_transaction_cn(T2) from rdb$database; >>

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$GET_TRANSACTION_CN works different in Super and Classic

2019-02-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
18.02.2019 1:49, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: Open two connections C1 and C2. C2: select current_transaction from rdb$database; -- let's call the result T2 C2: commit; C1: select rdb$get_transaction_cn(T2) from rdb$database; In Super C1 returns the commit number. In Classic it returns N