On 03.09.2013 10:47, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
>
>> Hm, I had to run autoreconf etc. on it to build it on Ubuntu 8.04
>>
>
> Did you try with initial package or with one we have in the tree?
> Must say I've generated configure myself (on fresh gentoo)
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:02:51PM +0400, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> No matter of this licensing issue almost all (correct be if
> I'm wrong) distros use --with-system-editline switch and distribute
> firebird packages violating GPL.
It would be GPL violation if a distribution package comp
Am 03.09.2013 10:47, schrieb Alex Peshkoff:
> On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
>
> To be precise I'm not sure why did that guy need automake at all :-)
> It's required only if one touch Makefile.am. For regular builds existing
> in the tree configure is OK.
> May be it's really
Am 03.09.2013 10:02, schrieb Alex Peshkoff:
> The main reason why do we include libedit at all is licensing
Yes we had a discussion on this topic with a debian maintainer back in
2002 when we had to replace calls to readline with editline.
> - built
> into all known to me distros libreadline (it
On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
> Hm, I had to run autoreconf etc. on it to build it on Ubuntu 8.04
>
Did you try with initial package or with one we have in the tree?
Must say I've generated configure myself (on fresh gentoo) cause
Makefile.am was slightly modified - I've remo
On 09/03/13 11:34, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
> Am 03.09.2013 09:13, schrieb Michal Kubecek:
>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:14:45AM +0200, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
>>> On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh editline
libr
Am 03.09.2013 09:08, schrieb Alex Peshkoff:
> On 09/03/13 09:14, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
>> On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>> On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
I ask this because in debian libed
Am 03.09.2013 09:13, schrieb Michal Kubecek:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:14:45AM +0200, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
>> On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh editline
>>> library. And (provided they build --with-sustem-editline
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:14:45AM +0200, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
> On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> >
> > I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh editline
> > library. And (provided they build --with-sustem-editline, in which I'm
> > quite sure) they use it in fi
On 09/03/13 09:14, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
> On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
>>> libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
>>>
>>> I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
>>> be nice if
On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
>> libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
>>
>> I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
>> be nice if also in the 2.5.x branch would be done so
>>
>
> I think
On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
> libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
>
> I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
> be nice if also in the 2.5.x branch would be done so
>
I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh ed
12 matches
Mail list logo
