On 2/1/21 10:24 PM, marius adrian popa wrote:
My guess old cpus or installs
Example got laptop with Windows 10 32 that is still supported by
Microsoft also have an old laptop with Ubuntu 32bit also another old
raspberry pi that is 32 bit only
I doubt all that list is worth having _new_ ver
> I doubt all that list is worth having _new_ versions 32 bit.
I agree. My original motivation to ask was to estimate whether I should keep
providing 32bit builds of FbNetExternalEngine. Not that it is a huge amount of
work, but still.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Fi
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/64-bit-os-vs-32-bit-os/
I like this quote :
"You might be asking -> why do I care? Why does Brian want Microsoft to
stop shipping an Operating System that is likely only chosen by mistake? My
problem is this: Backblaze, like any good technology vendor, wants to be
ea
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:32:42 +0300
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2/1/21 10:24 PM, marius adrian popa wrote:
> > My guess old cpus or installs
> >
> > Example got laptop with Windows 10 32 that is still supported by >
> > Microsoft also have an old laptop with Ubuntu 32bit also anoth
Current Ubuntu LTS is 64 bit , only with selected packages for 32 bit apps
(Thanks to Steam and Wine apps)
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2019/06/ubuntu-is-dropping-all-32-bit-support-going-forward
Even FreeBSD moved i386 to Tier 2 for FreeBSD 13.x
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce
> I doubt that our user base for 32-bit ARM is really very significant but
> 32-bit ARM chips probably have a good future ahead of them. 32-bit x86 chips
> seem to largely have gone the way of 16-bit x86.
What 32-bit ARM you have in mind? I wouldn't put my bet on ARMv6, ARMv5, etc.
;) Not sure ab
There is an important point sitting here for support of legacy
applications. While a standalone x86 Firebird Server is likely to be of
increasingly little interest, an x86 client library may need to be
supported for much longer. This then gives rise to the question: what
about the embedded serv
On 2/2/21 12:16 PM, Paul Reeves wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:32:42 +0300
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2/1/21 10:24 PM, marius adrian popa wrote:
My guess old cpus or installs
Example got laptop with Windows 10 32 that is still supported by >
Microsoft also have an old laptop wi
02.02.2021 11:31, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
I'm unsure what to do with FB4. We used to publish 32-bit binaries for beta & rc - i.e.
looks like they should be in release too but I see no other reason why should they be in
release...
In contrast to 32->64 porting, maintaining of
Hi *,
what action should I do to get isc_arg_warning?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On 2/2/21 1:59 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
what action should I do to get isc_arg_warning?
Revoke non-existing grant.
In employee:
SQL> revoke EXECUTE ON PROCEDURE ADD_EMP_PROJ from john;
Warning: EXECUTE on ADD_EMP_PROJ is not granted to JOHN.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interfac
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:31:10 +0300
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2/2/21 12:16 PM, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > I doubt that our user base for 32-bit ARM is really very significant but
> > 32-bit ARM chips probably have a good future ahead of them.
>
> Not sure. I visited eShop - only 4
Yes, client library must be 32 bit too for the long time.Many existig
applications are 32bit and cannot be "migrated" to 64 bit in the near
futureRegards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
> Yes, client library must be 32 bit too for the long time.
> Many existig applications are 32bit and cannot be "migrated" to 64 bit
> in the near future
On the other hand, these applications can still use older fbclient.dll.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Deve
Yes, good point :)Onli some new feature need new client. But It is rather rare,
but happen as e.g compression as i remember.Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
02.02.2021, 08:52, "Jiří Činčura" : Yes, client library must be 32 bit too for the long time. Many existig applications are 32bit and cannot be "migrated" to 64 bit in the near futureOn the other hand, these applications can still use older fbclient.dll. --Mgr. Jiří Činčurahttps://www.tabsoverspace
> Yes, good point :)
> Onli some new feature need new client. But It is rather rare, but
> happen as e.g compression as i remember.
Basically whenever a new protocol version is created.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https:
On 2/2/21 3:33 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Yes, good point :)
Onli some new feature need new client. But It is rather rare, but
happen as e.g compression as i remember.
Basically whenever a new protocol version is created.
Not all features make sense for old apps. What sense in having statement
> >> Yes, good point :)
> >> Onli some new feature need new client. But It is rather rare, but
> >> happen as e.g compression as i remember.
> > Basically whenever a new protocol version is created.
> >
>
> Not all features make sense for old apps. What sense in having statement
> timeouts or SQL
On 2021-02-02 00:35, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Vlad,
https://www.gitmemory.com/issue/grpc/grpc/18057/486312183
There is no mention of SIO_LOOPBACK_FAST_PATH in this link
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/stop-error-0xd1-when-you-set-
the-sio-loopback-fast-path-flag-in-windows-8-or-windows
On 2021-02-02 11:14, Tony Whyman wrote:
There is an important point sitting here for support of legacy
applications. While a standalone x86 Firebird Server is likely to be
of increasingly little interest, an x86 client library may need to be
supported for much longer. This then gives rise to the
02.02.2021 15:47, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
For Embedded, I think that people still needing 32-bit and Embedded, are likely not using the latest and greatest version of
Firebird. A policy that says for example that Firebird 4.0 is the last to provide x86-32 builds might be good enough.
+1
Regar
02.02.2021 16:47, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
A policy
that says for example that Firebird 4.0 is the last to provide x86-32
builds might be good enough.
I'd suggest to keep x86 builds for the v4.x series and remove them from
v5 onwards (but keep the codebase compilable on 32-bits). Whether v5 x8
I am a simple user, so I must accommodate their policies. But I embrace this
idea.
Congratulations to all for your work
--
Ismael
- Original Message -
From: "Dmitry Yemanov"
To: "For discussion among Firebird Developers"
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2021 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebi
Multiple sum query cause ad incorrect SQLDA structure error
---
Key: CORE-6480
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-6480
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Comp
Dialect 1. Not consistent result of two expressions with divide of NUMERIC with
scale
-
Key: CORE-6481
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-6481
Project: F
26 matches
Mail list logo
