Re: [Firebird-docs] Test repository CVS to git migration

2017-10-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 18/10/17 15:15, Mark Rotteveel wrote: Given the normalization done during conversion, that should not be a problem (unless a new file extension is introduced that isn't considered a text file by the configuration of the conversion). The thing I mentioned with autocrlf is the old way of

Re: [Firebird-docs] Test repository CVS to git migration

2017-10-18 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi Norman, >> A number of source files in my (Windows) CVS working dir have Unix line >> endings though, whereas their Git counterparts have DOS endings. >> >> That's no problem, as long as it doesn't lead to a huge number of 'changes' >> and log messages when such a file is committed,

Re: [Firebird-docs] Test repository CVS to git migration

2017-10-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
Afternoon Paul, On 18/10/17 14:08, Paul Vinkenoog wrote: A number of source files in my (Windows) CVS working dir have Unix line endings though, whereas their Git counterparts have DOS endings. That's no problem, as long as it doesn't lead to a huge number of 'changes' and log messages when

Re: [Firebird-docs] Test repository CVS to git migration

2017-10-18 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Mark Rotteveel wrote: > Fixed in https://github.com/mrotteveel/test-firebird-documentation-4 I cloned this repository and built a number of targets, both in master and in the B_Release branch. Everything worked exactly as in my CVS checkout. A number of source files in my (Windows) CVS working

Re: [Firebird-docs] Test repository CVS to git migration

2017-10-18 Thread Köditz , Martin
Hi Mark, I used your repository for few Tests and further translation. I couldn't find any problems. The Linux scripts are working and no strange behavior when I create the html or pdf outputs. >From my point of view everything is fine and it is much easier to add new >contents (for me).

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN committers: SourceForge to terminate CVS support on November 30th

2017-10-18 Thread Lester Caine
On 18/10/17 02:40, Helen Borrie wrote: >>From my dabblings with your test project yesterday, I think my > problems are with the Git desktop, mostly. I don't like the UI much > at all, although being able to connect from it to the source project > is a nice feature, but not a life saver. When I