On 19-12-2016 11:39, Andre van Zuydam wrote:
> So bouncing in here on a tangent, I've done this with a couple of
> Source forge projects, simply set Source forge to clone the Github
> project or visa versa. The only reason I would suggest having things on
> Github is for more visibility. Anyway
On 18/12/2016 11:48:34 AM, Paul Vinkenoog wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Isn't it time to consider migrating the documentation repository from
> SourceForge CVS to GitHub?
>
> SourceForge itself considers CVS deprecated, and having the repository
> on GitHub might increase
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Isn't it time to consider migrating the documentation repository from
> SourceForge CVS to GitHub?
>
> SourceForge itself considers CVS deprecated, and having the repository
> on GitHub might increase visibility and will likely lower the barrier
> for contribution.
No