2009/5/11 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
> Probably my main problem was that "assumption is the mother of all
> f...@#ups" because I read
> http://www.firebirdsql.org/dotnetfirebird/documentation/api/1.7/FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.FbTransactionOptions.html
This is for version 1.7. It's way too old.
> Or am I
Mon, 11 May 2009 17:46:31 +0300, Jiri Cincura :
> 2009/5/11 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
>> well ... pretty much anything I could think of. From what I googled - I
>> need a (Shared | LockRead | NoWait | RecordVersion) transaction. I have
>> tried several variations (consistency, concurency, readcommited ..
2009/5/11 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
> well ... pretty much anything I could think of. From what I googled - I
> need a (Shared | LockRead | NoWait | RecordVersion) transaction. I have
> tried several variations (consistency, concurency, readcommited ...). It
> is intended to read through a table of ID`s t
Mon, 11 May 2009 14:24:16 +0300, Jiri Cincura :
> 2009/5/11 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
>> public FbTransaction BeginTransaction(FbTransactionOptions options,
>> string transactionName)
>>
>> overload of the function, but according to google fb 2.1 checks the
>> header
>> in a different way than fb 2.0.
Fri, 08 May 2009 19:03:12 +0300, Jiri Cincura :
> 2009/5/8 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
>> Yes, I do mean those, but for example "LockRead | Shared" throws an
>> exception upon connect. If I use only "ReadCommited" it`s ok. Could you
>
> Use IsolationLevel.ReadCommited and that's OK.
>
>> paste a link to so
2009/5/11 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
> public FbTransaction BeginTransaction(FbTransactionOptions options,
> string transactionName)
>
> overload of the function, but according to google fb 2.1 checks the header
> in a different way than fb 2.0. Is anyone else using this method (or am I
> a lot dummer tha
2009/5/8 Ivan Arabadzhiev :
> Yes, I do mean those, but for example "LockRead | Shared" throws an
> exception upon connect. If I use only "ReadCommited" it`s ok. Could you
Use IsolationLevel.ReadCommited and that's OK.
> paste a link to some kind of documentation on those parameters (I did ask
>
Thu, 07 May 2009 15:09:31 +0300, Jiri Cincura :
> The FbTransactionOptions has no valid combinations. It's just a holder
> for transaction params. Maybe you mean FbTransactionBehavior. There
> you have
> Consistency = 1,
> Concurrency = 2,
> Shared = 4,
> Protected
The FbTransactionOptions has no valid combinations. It's just a holder
for transaction params. Maybe you mean FbTransactionBehavior. There
you have
Consistency = 1,
Concurrency = 2,
Shared = 4,
Protected = 8,
Exclusive = 16,
Wait = 32,
NoWait
It`s not actually a provider issue but I was unable to find documentation
on the available valid combinations of options, and I can`t really find a
reason why firebird doeasn`t like my combinations... can anyone give a
hand or should I continue in (the not really successful) trial-and-error
10 matches
Mail list logo
