On 1/25/08, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jiri, i cannot access tracker right now, is there any maintenance
scheduled? I try it once more later.
I don't know. Right now tracker is working. No rush, ...
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ |
Jiri Cincura wrote:
I don't know. Right now tracker is working
right now indeed :) ...i left some words, we can talk about it, if find my
suggestions reasonable (or vice versa) :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DBConcurrencyException-tp13530573p15083943.html
Hi, sorry for kicking this thread up, but I'm trying to solve this
issue and I have no reply from reporter in tracker and I want to
agree, that I'm doing the fixture right.
paha, if you can, reply in tracker [DNET-126], 'cause I'll be able
to do the fix and close issue. Thanks.
--
Jiri {x2}
Hi Jiri, i cannot access tracker right now, is there any maintenance
scheduled? I try it once more later.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DBConcurrencyException-tp13530573p15082607.html
Sent from the firebird-net-provider mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Jiri Cincura wrote:
On 11/1/07, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also read an interesting remark to DBConcurrencyException in MSDN
When performing batch updates with the ContinueUpdateOnError property of
the
DataAdapter set to true, this exception is thrown if all row updates
fail.
Jiri Cincura wrote:
Oh, now I understand. I was almost sleeping, so I was thinking wrong.
So the main idea behind this is, when I get error, let the row
untouched (without AcceptChanges) so I'll be able to repeat the call
to DB, right?
Bingo :)) . I don't know if SqlDataAdapter does so
On 11/2/07, Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should echeck what is being done by Sql Client if possible, and do
the same thing.
I agree. But I thread we're talking about more than one problem, so
it's a little bit hard to keep what's going on.
Maybe we can split prolems into seprate threads
Hello:
Maybe we can split prolems into seprate threads or create tracker
items and solve problems there. What do you think?
putting them into the tracker will be the best.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog: http://carlosga.wordpress.com/
FirebirdClient :
On 11/2/07, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are 100% right, i asked the same questions yesterday on russian forum to
know, how sqladapter performs, but still no response. What i can say for
sure, if you get DBConcurrencyException, you definitely should have
something in
No Jiri, i mean, when we have ContinueOnError = true , and if we throw any
exception or not, doesn't matter, we should call AcceptChanges (of course if
AcceptChangesDuringUpdate = true) only for those rows, that have no error.
As i said, imagine you have ContinueOnError=true and 2 rows violate
Concerning the second part of my suggestion. Of course i can achieve desired
goals by setting AcceptChangesDuringUpdate= false and then after Update
looping throw rows committing good rows, and leaving bad rows aside. Of
course it would mean one extra loop for me what is not a problem for small
Hello:
This may be not big problem to change. If there's no objection, I can do this.
We should echeck what is being done by Sql Client if possible, and do
the same thing.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog: http://carlosga.wordpress.com/
FirebirdClient :
I've got confirmation, that SqlDataAdapter do throws DBConcurrencyException
when all row updates fail in ContinueUpdateOnError=true mode, and erroneous
rows are not committed (RowVersion remains Modified).
--
View this message in context:
Jiri Cincura wrote:
On 11/2/07, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, but i would like to get from provider original localized
messages
for standard exceptions like concurrency to identify the exception
itself,
not to show it direct to user ;-) . It is not perfect, and must be
avoided
paha wrote:
Could you give me direct link to bugtracker please :)
I found it
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DBConcurrencyException-tf4731950.html#a13544215
Sent from the firebird-net-provider mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 11/2/07, Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
putting them into the tracker will be the best.
OK. Please, Paha, can you put every single problme into tracker, with
description (try to use as much as possible info from this thread,
etc.)? We'll look at it and it will be more clear. You can assing
On 11/2/07, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jiri Cincura wrote:
Oh, now I understand. I was almost sleeping, so I was thinking wrong.
So the main idea behind this is, when I get error, let the row
untouched (without AcceptChanges) so I'll be able to repeat the call
to DB, right?
Jiri Cincura wrote:
One more little question, also about this Exceptions. What do you think
about throwing localized messages? (I mean storing once (new
DBConcurrencyException()).Message, (new DataException()).Message and so
on
somewhere in local dictionary, and using them instead of
Jiri Cincura wrote:
On 11/2/07, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are 100% right, i asked the same questions yesterday on russian forum
to
know, how sqladapter performs, but still no response. What i can say for
sure, if you get DBConcurrencyException, you definitely should have
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez ™ wrote:
Hello:
This may be not big problem to change. If there's no objection, I can do
this.
We should echeck what is being done by Sql Client if possible, and do
the same thing.
You are 100% right, i asked the same questions yesterday on russian forum to
I've also read an interesting remark to DBConcurrencyException in MSDN
When performing batch updates with the ContinueUpdateOnError property of the
DataAdapter set to true, this exception is thrown if all row updates fail.
In this case, this DBConcurrencyException contains DataRow objects for
On 11/1/07, paha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also read an interesting remark to DBConcurrencyException in MSDN
When performing batch updates with the ContinueUpdateOnError property of the
DataAdapter set to true, this exception is thrown if all row updates fail.
In this case, this
22 matches
Mail list logo
