On Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:52 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Alexander Gräf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, yes, the database seems to need support for two-phase
commits
If Ann or Helen would read that! Of course, Firebird *does* support
two-phase/limbo transaction. However, don't ask me how to utilize
On Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:41 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello:
Thank you for this wonderfully concise answer ;-)
hehehe :)
Any plans for doing it in some not too distant future ?
In first place no, i should give a review to that but in first place
t
Hello:
Thank you for this wonderfully concise answer ;-)
hehehe :)
Any plans for doing it in some not too distant future ?
In first place no, i should give a review to that but in first place
that classes are for distributed transactiosn, not sure if they could be
implemented fo firebird, i n
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:20 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:
Hello:
I wonder what the relationship between the Firebird .NET provider and
System.Transactions is. I've searched the archives of the list and
not found any mention of TransactionScope.
Did you already implemen
Hello:
I wonder what the relationship between the Firebird .NET provider and
System.Transactions is. I've searched the archives of the list and not
found any mention of TransactionScope.
Did you already implement support for these system transactions ?
No.
--
Best regards
Carlos Guzmán Á
