[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-969) GFix force sweep

GFix force sweep Key: DNET-969 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-969 Project: .NET Data provider Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Alexander Muylaert Assignee: Jiri Cincura Do a sweep

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] .NET 4 support

Hi Gerdus The question is... should "we" be affected by "your" difficulties upgrading 500 pcs. I have the same problem, it is even thousands and all running on different locations, but we try to manage. (Failing miserably, but that is another story) I agree with your opinion that you can

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firing event when event count is 0

I say ney. It doesn’t make sense to raise unraised events. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jiří Činčura Sent: vrijdag 16 december 2016 17:15 To: For users & developers of the Firebird .NET

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Stored procedures etc. in .NET

Hi Jiri There is interest on our behalf. But we will only switch to FB 3... after release 2 or something like that.That doesn't mean we are not interested in kicking this into motion. Thanks Alexander > From: j...@cincura.net > To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Mon, 27

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-669) rare null reference exception in OnRemoteEventCounts

: 4.10.0.0 Reporter: Alexander Muylaert-Gelein Assignee: Jiri Cincura Hi Jiri@Jira On rare occasions we found a null reference exception log inside our exception system. During the FbRemoveEnvet.OnRemoveEventCounts it fails somewhere. I've checked the code and the only

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-657) Lots of exceptions by transaction destructor

Affects Versions: 4.9.0.0 Reporter: Alexander Muylaert-Gelein Assignee: Jiri Cincura Priority: Critical FbTransaction doesn't dispose the internal GDSTransaction anymore. If you look at FbTransaction.Commit, you'll notice it calls UpdateTransaction

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] VS2008 ADO.NET confusion

I had likewise errors on multiple computers in the past weeks. They all had failed windows updates in common. Completely updating windows solved it for me on multiple occasions. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jiří Činčura Sent:

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Parser class/library

I know we are sponsoring This... But it sounds to me like so much work and so little gain. Sure, the current parse thing is slow and buggy, but only a few minor bugs and performance gain Will be limited as well. I think looking at 3th party parsers isn,'t a bad idea at All. Sent from my

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Migrations

Hi all Jiri asked me to kick in because we have two products. One with one generator per column, one with one generator per database. Pro's of generator per table are You have the feeling of a sequence. There shouldn't be a gap, you can do "math" on it.This is how other db's have it since

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Compiling error

Yes... If you switch to Visual Studio 2015... it is solved.Looks to me that Jiri is already on the next level. From: nftimm...@hotmail.com To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:53:57 -0300 Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] Compiling error Hello When i download

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Multithread insert

I don't think there is even an issue here. inside two different transactions, you simply cannot update the same record. Who would win in the end and what would be the end result. I'm pretty sure if you can solve this, the firebird team would gladly implement this. a > Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-622) Performance optimization for FbCommand.LogCommand

: ADO.NET Provider Affects Versions: 4.7.0.0 Reporter: Alexander Muylaert-Gelein Assignee: Jiri Cincura Hi I noticed that the emitting of the trace code is relatively slow. It takes a few percentages (6%) of the total duration of a restore script. Including

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] ADO.NET provider 4.7.0.0 and DDEX 3.0.2

Hi Jiri Thanks, I'll make sure it is tested this weekend on our servers.Already available on nuget, because update-package doesn't work yet? thanks a From: j...@cincura.net To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net; firebird-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; firebird-to...@yahoogroups.com

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] OutOfMemoryException

You might already have expected this. I don't think Jiri is aware of any leaks inside the provider, otherwise they would have been resolved. Can you make a reproducible scenario? thanks a From: lo...@nucleo.co.za To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:34:36

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Keep-alive packets

Yes, I was planning to reply on facebook as well. I was a bit surprised, but this could be the reason why 1. It is random2. It is on some networks often, on others rarely or never3. It is for no reason. In all honesty, I always try to keep a socket live with actual CHANGING bytes every 30

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Random crashes in Finalizers

, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Alexander Muylaert-Gelein amuylaert_gel...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi I intensively use firebird and provider... I always use the dispose method (using) and I don't depend on the GC for this. I never had any of the exceptions refererred to. Wouldn't it be better

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Random crashes in Finalizers

Hi I intensively use firebird and provider... I always use the dispose method (using) and I don't depend on the GC for this. I never had any of the exceptions refererred to. Wouldn't it be better *not* to depend on something horrible as the gc for something as important as your db

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Questions with performance metrics doing large inserts into DB

read somewhere that Looping in .NET is somewhat slower than in Delphi, but there are things you can do optimize the .NET loops. Thank you, Edward Mendez From: Alexander Muylaert-Gelein [mailto:amuylaert_gel...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 1:54 AM To: firebird-net-provider

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Questions with performance metrics doing large inserts into DB

I personally really like the one from red-gate but the visual studio profiler is also good. a From: emendez...@nc.rr.com To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:51:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Questions with performance metrics doing

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Questions with performance metrics doing large inserts into DB

Hi Edward I'm also coming from a delphi background (using FIB) and we have ported/are already porting for 5 years our applications to .net. I have noticed indeed that Delphi/fib is faster then .net provider. But never in the magnitude of 500%. It looked acceptable slower. Your write code

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Character Set Confusion For Spanish Characters

Hi UTF8 Both your database and your connectionstrings (Everywhere…) Van: Steve Harp [mailto:st...@abelscreening.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 13 november 2012 21:20 Aan: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Onderwerp: [Firebird-net-provider] Character Set Confusion For Spanish

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Empty string for Role invalid in 3.x

Hi I migrated from 2.6 and 2.7 to 3.0 without changing any code. I also never fill in the role. It must be something else. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jiri Cincura [mailto:disk...@cincura.net] Verzonden: maandag 5 november 2012 12:32 Aan: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Empty string for Role invalid in 3.x

Why not use the FBConnectionStringBuilder? That is what I always do and indeed, I don't set the role explicitly to empty. So this might indeed be your problem. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: André Knappstein [mailto:knappst...@beta-eigenheim.de] Verzonden: maandag 5 november 2012

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-409) Inserting large BLOB field (500 MB) - System.OutOfMemoryException

No offence, but sounds like a bad plan anyway... -Original Message- From: Zsák Szabolcs (JIRA) [mailto:trac...@firebirdsql.org] Sent: vrijdag 17 februari 2012 15:59 To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-409)

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] UTF8 issue and Firebird Dot Net Data Provider

I don’t have this problem. Is your connectionstring correct? Use FbConnectionstringBuilder and make sure you set it to utf8? Good luck Alexander Van: Brad Swearingen [mailto:swear...@yadasystems.com] Verzonden: woensdag 18 januari 2012 14:52 Aan:

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] DNet - 234

received in thread 52 Operation received in thread 0 Operation received in thread 0 Operation received in thread 0 Operation received in thread 50 threadStarted Create Transaction Commit transaction force close -Original Message- From: Alexander Muylaert [mailto:amuylaert_gel

[Firebird-net-provider] DNet - 234

Hi Jiri We were having some issues with the events system again. In combination with stored procedures. After executing a stored proc, some of the events on the network don't get triggered anymore. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:60r72F44y-sJ:tracker.fi

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-335) The nullable flag of a stored procedure parameter seems to be wrong

: Bug Components: ADO.NET Provider Affects Versions: 2.5.2 Reporter: Alexander Muylaert Assignee: Jiri Cincura Hi Jiri I was having an argument with the guys from llblgenpro. They said that there is no way to know if a stored procedure parameter is nullable

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.5, firebirdclient 2.5.2 issues with llblgenpro 3

Cincura [mailto:disk...@cincura.net] Sent: zaterdag 17 juli 2010 15:05 To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers Cc: supp...@llblgen.com Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.5, firebirdclient 2.5.2 issues with llblgenpro 3 On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 16:37, Alexander Muylaert

[Firebird-net-provider] More info from llblgenpro

Hi Jiri This might also help? Thanks Alexander Muylaert wrote: Otis wrote: As you use a non-final Firebird build, it might be you use features not supported by the Firebird ADO.NET provider yet. The thing is, we use the GetSchema ProcedureParameters call of the ADO.NET provider to obtain

[Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.5, firebirdclient 2.5.2 issues with llblgenpro 3

Hi Jiri I'm having some issues on getting llblgenpro mapping to work in combination with firebird 2.5. The guys from llblgenpro blame you ;-) I'm pretty sure your driver works, can you confirm or deny the text below? I use 2.5.2 from the website as firebirdclient. Thanks Alexander Muylaert

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.5, firebirdclient 2.5.2 issues with llblgenpro 3

Hi Jiri The results of GetSchema(ProcedureParameters, new[] { null, null, SYS_CHECK_COUNTRY }) seems to be 100% correct. All data should be in there, I don't think *you* need to worry now. I'll come back to this. (or not... and then you don't have to do anything ;-)) Thanks Alexander

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.5, firebirdclient 2.5.2 issues with llblgenpro 3

Hi Jiri Aha, getting closer to the bug. Could you please have a look at http://www.llblgen.com/TinyForum/Messages.aspx?ThreadID=18291StartAtMessage =0#102382. We are having some issues with the metadata returned from the database through your provider. Thanks in advance. Alexander

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Rename a table

Then stick with oracle, it is a good/better database, but stop spamming my mail account. I'm subscribed to this newsgroup because I care and sponsor the .net provider. Not to listen to some hysterical chicken threatening to go back to oracle. Did you know firebird doesn't support fulltext

[Firebird-net-provider] Recoverable exceptions, fatalities

Hi Jiri I would like to make a seperation between recoverable exceptions and fatal exceptions coming from the database. A fatal error might be network lost, database gone, ... If this happens I would like to try to reconnect the client or even shutdown the application. A recoverable error,

[Firebird-net-provider] Building my own FirebirdSQL

Hi Jiri I checked out the sourcecode of firebirdprovider and I got a working build of the provider. Well, in runtime everything works, in visual studio I have the following problem. Do you have an idea what it could be? I'm building on VS2010, Premium, for .net 4.0? (I just put it on

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Building my own FirebirdSQL

Yep, -Original Message- From: Jiri Cincura [mailto:disk...@cincura.net] Sent: maandag 26 april 2010 10:29 To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Building my own FirebirdSQL On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:18, Alexander Muylaert

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Building my own FirebirdSQL

Hi Jiri The line is there and if I play around in this procedure, like putting extra exceptions in here, I can see it it perfectly called. I can also open the model. I just can't update it anymore. If I do an update with your build, no connection info is asked. If I do it with my build, a popup

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Building my own FirebirdSQL

Just to let you know I asked with subversion for the tagged 2.5.2 source again, opened it in 2010. Had it converted, switched the framework to 4.0. Made a fix inside the eventmanager and now everything works again. So I think something went wrong in your changes since 2.5.2, probably last

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] EF query natural scan

: [Firebird-net-provider] EF query natural scan Hi, On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 08:03, Alexander Muylaert amuylaert_gel...@hotmail.com wrote: inners first and then the outers well it's possible. I don't know how much work it is, because it's done via visitor pattern and sometimes you don't know

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-309) Possible workaround for CORE-1239, Left outer - inner join

Components: ADO.NET Provider Affects Versions: 2.5.2 Environment: All Reporter: Alexander Muylaert Assignee: Jiri Cincura The entity framework often generates statements that go like from table a left outer join table b on a.bid = b.id inner join table c

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] VS2010 solution/projects conversion

Because it is 2010 times better as 2008? Kind regards Alexander -Original Message- From: Douglas Tosi [mailto:dougla...@gmail.com] Sent: zaterdag 10 april 2010 19:34 To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] VS2010

[Firebird-net-provider] EF query natural scan

Hi Jiri I just discover something weird in FB RC2. I posted it on tracker, but maybe you might be able to solve (workaround) it? Could you have a quick look at this? Maybe I'm just plain wrong. http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-2963 Thanks Alexander

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-307) TransactionScope

TransactionScope Key: DNET-307 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-307 Project: .NET Data provider Issue Type: Improvement Components: ADO.NET Provider Reporter: Alexander Muylaert

[Firebird-net-provider] Entity Framework 4.0 delete statements

Hi Jiri I have a question for you. It looks like the generation of the delete statement has changed inside ef4.0. (I'm not sure if it has changed, but I'm sure it is not the behavior i'm expecting) When one is deleting a record with foreign navigation properties, it includes these

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-287) MemoryProblem when not dispose the DbCommand

Hi André Yes, this is way better. Because now you are doing less (you don't allocate a new client command, you don't ask your server to parse your statement 50.000 times, you don't ask your server to dispose his handle 50.000 times). But still you should dispose what you don't need. It

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Generated primary key columns in EF

I have to admit that I allready wrote a tool for me that fixes the edmx file on every build. For me it is easy, If the fieldname is ID, I set the pattern. But I can imagine that for some people this is not possible. -- From: Jiri Cincura

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Using the .NET providerwithInterbasedatabases

to deploy access from a bunch of 64 bit servers. I can configure the web apps to run in a 32 bit worker process, but I am looking to avoid that if possible. Cheers, David Clegg From: Alexander Muylaert

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Using the .NET provider with Interbasedatabases

Hi David Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Who knows... It is for sure not designed to work with Interbase. Ask Embarcadero for an appropriate driver for interbase. They have their own. kind regards Alexander From: David Clegg Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:17 PM To:

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Hi everyone : new to this list, problem with DDEX

Hi Richard I wouldn't use the firebird provider for interbase access. It is not supported at all. I would seek for .net providers for interbase. kind regards Alexander From: Richard Clarke Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:56 PM To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Hi everyone : new to this list, problem with DDEX

Hi Richard Maybe this is interesting. http://cc.embarcadero.com/Free.aspx?id=25497 kind regards Alexander From: Richard Clarke Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:56 PM To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] Hi everyone : new to this list,problem

[Firebird-net-provider] Firebird 2.5 QueueEvents CPU goes to 100%

Hi Jiri I would like you to inform you about an issue we reported earlier. You know that we had issues with the event system. Sometimes the 2.5 core went berserk and started writing errors to the logfile. Making the logfile huge after a while. The current state of the firebird is the