On 12/24/07, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The actual trunk sources have the changes take a look at it ( there are
> changes in base classes and interfaces )
Damn, I must missed some commits. :)
Merry Christmas.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.v
Hello:
> Sorry for late reply, mail stucked on the bottom.
>
Don't worry :)
> Well I think we can use:
> * separate place (branch or tag or folder) in SVN
> * create conditional builds
>
> I don't know, what changed in SDK. If it's some extension, I propose
> to use conditional builds. But if th
On 11/27/07, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it will work with VS 2008 :) but there are too many changes in
> DDEX implementation in the VS 2008 SDK so i think we can do an specific
> version for that, what do you think ??
Sorry for late reply, mail stucked on the bottom.
Hello:
> I've tested it under VS2008 Final and works fine. :D IMO we don't need
> branching.
>
I know it will work with VS 2008 :) but there are too many changes in
DDEX implementation in the VS 2008 SDK so i think we can do an specific
version for that, what do you think ??
--
Carlos Guzm
On 11/26/07, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> > You have done some modification in sources?
> >
> Not yet, i'm going to move current DDEX provider to branches today so we
> can modify the devel one to match VS 2008
I've tested it under VS2008 Fin
Hello:
Sorry for the delay.
> You have done some modification in sources?
>
Not yet, i'm going to move current DDEX provider to branches today so we
can modify the devel one to match VS 2008
> If you install FirebirdClient it's by default in
> %ProgramFiles%\FirebirdClient. The if you wan to i
On 11/22/07, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> > 1. What about adding this files into some folders (i.e. VS2005, VS2008
> > + xxbit systems). This will be more clear for people, isn't it?
>
> Looks fine to me but i should have a modified version of the DDEX
> provider for VS2008, and i
Hello:
> 1. What about adding this files into some folders (i.e. VS2005, VS2008
> + xxbit systems). This will be more clear for people, isn't it?
Looks fine to me but i should have a modified version of the DDEX
provider for VS2008, and it maybe better to put the actual version on
the svn branchs
Hello:
> Carlos, are you alive? :)
Sure, busy but alive ;)
> --
> Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
> http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
>
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microso
Carlos, are you alive? :)
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Stud
On 11/19/07, André Knappstein, Controlling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jiri,
> all of that sounds VERY good to me. If the time for implementing these
> changes can be spared this will be a big help for a lot of people.
During sunday I was thinking about this a little bit more. Maybe (not
tested y
> 2.1. BTW no matter wheter you have VS SDK you can use ...Less.reg, isn't it?
> 3. What about installation. Maybe should provide some no so common
> path like %ProgramFiles%\FirebirdClient, 'cause there're *.txt files
> with same name from FirebirdClient installation, so during install
> some ca
Hi Carlos and *,
now we have bunch of *.reg files for importing stuff into registry
when installing DDEX provider. I've now finished testing VS 2008 &
DDEX and we will have another files.
So wanna to ask:
1. What about adding this files into some folders (i.e. VS2005, VS2008
+ xxbit systems). Thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
