On 2012-11-27, at 7:27 AM, Peter Stalpers wrote:
> 1. The department bought an application for preparing pharmaceutical
> medication and this application only supports Firebird as its backend
> database.
> 2. The department also bought logistcal module and this application only
> supports Progre
Den 2012-11-27 13:27 skrev Peter
Stalpers såhär:
1. The department bought an application for preparing
pharmaceutical medication and this application only supports
Firebird as its backend database.
2. The department also boug
> 1. The department bought an application for preparing pharmaceutical
> medication and this application only supports Firebird as its backend
> database.
> 2. The department also bought logistcal module and this application
> only supports Progress as its backend database.
> 3. The department als
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:55:28PM +0100, André Knappstein wrote:
> Firebird _is_ a SQL-dbase.
>
> "Integration" in that common sense is not possible. MS SQL server will
> not be able to "read" Firebird databases, like it won't read any other
> database format.
>
> You 're probably talking abo
Firebird _is_ a SQL-dbase.
"Integration" in that common sense is not possible. MS SQL server will
not be able to "read" Firebird databases, like it won't read any other
database format.
You 're probably talking about the "management studio" or any other
GUI tool which will employ an ODBC drive
