Hello,
I need to rebuild some records in my database. I have to choices:
1. Firstly I delete set of records and then insert new ones.
2. I update the existing ones.
What solution is preferable? Will scenerio number 1. cause more garbage in
database and decrease its performance?
Thank you.
On 15 Sep 2015 23:51:11 -0700, "brucedickin...@wp.pl [firebird-support]"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to rebuild some records in my database. I have to choices:
>
> 1. Firstly I delete set of records and then insert new ones.
> 2. I update the existing ones.
>
>
>> I need to rebuild some records in my database. I have to choices:
>>
>> 1. Firstly I delete set of records and then insert new ones.
>> 2. I update the existing ones.
>>
>> What solution is preferable? Will scenerio number 1. cause more garbage
>in
>> database and decrease its performance?
>
Thank you guys.
You know, sometimes it is just easier to delete everything and recreate it once
gain, from the algorithmic point of view. But if it is better (yes I have
foreign keys and unique keys) to update things than i will make an extra effort
to do it properly.
On 16/09/2015 07:51, brucedickin...@wp.pl [firebird-support] wrote:
I need to rebuild some records in my database. I have to choices:
1. Firstly I delete set of records and then insert new ones.
2. I update the existing ones.
What solution is preferable? Will scenerio number 1. cause more
> ---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
> > Hello,
>
> I need to rebuild some records in my database. I have to choices:
>
> 1. Firstly I delete set of records and then insert new ones.
> 2. I update the existing ones.
>
> What solution is preferable? Will
> They will generate a comparable amount of garbage, but I think updating the
> existing records is better than delete + insert, especially if there are also
> foreign key references to those records.
I don't think so.
Unless you are updating every column in the row, the UPDATE will generate a
Hi,
Translation was completed several weeks ago, now Helen Borrie performs
proof-reading and editing of the text.
Recent preview version of LR looks very promising.
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon
Hello everybody
Do you know what has happened with the translation of the document
Hello everybody
Do you know what has happened with the translation of the document
"Firebird 2.5 Language Reference" from Russian to English?
They had requested for donation with the promise that their work would be
ready in February 2015.
The donation was made, now it is September 2015, but
Hi,
Translation was completed several weeks ago, now Helen Borrie performs
proof-reading and editing of the text.
Recent preview version of LR looks very promising.
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon
Hello everybody
Do you know what has happened with the translation of the document
Thank you very much, Alexey
Is there an estimated date for the publication?
Greetings.
Walter.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Translation was completed several weeks ago, now Helen
Thank you very much, Alexey.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> See page 20-21 here
>
>
Nothing to think of. If you need update go with update otherwise delete and
insert is better.
Trust yourself.
Regards
Bogdan
--- Original message ---
From: 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com [firebird-support]
Date: 16. september 2015 5.40.22 pop.
Hello Sean, and everybody
That's a very interesting and very important theme: "the new record version
will only include the updated fields -- not a full copy of the row"
Do you know where I can find a document, web-page, book or video that
explains that? If it has images or graphics, much
Hi,
See page 20-21 here
http://ru.scribd.com/doc/20128182/The-InterBase-and-Firebird-Developer-Magazine-Issue-2-2005
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon
Hello Sean, and everybody
That's a very interesting and very important theme: "the new record
version will only include the updated fields
15 matches
Mail list logo